Re: debug vs fvwm_debug_msgs

2006-07-06 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:35:10PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/5/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I have found FVWM_DEBUG_MSGS and DEBUG ifdef's all over the code (as expected). But it seems to me they are allways used at the same time, one defining the other, and

Re: debug vs fvwm_debug_msgs

2006-07-06 Thread seventh guardian
On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:35:10PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/5/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I have found FVWM_DEBUG_MSGS and DEBUG ifdef's all over the code (as expected). But it seems to me they are allways

debug code cleanup patch #1

2006-07-06 Thread seventh guardian
Hi. This is a debug code cleanup patch: It removes most of the FvwmPager debug code (very old), also removing useless debug code from fvwmsignal.c and fvmwsignal.h. It also removes an unused #define from libs/PictureUtils.c, which Olivier forgot to remove :P I've only put safe changes on this

Re: debug code cleanup patch #1

2006-07-06 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:20:14PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: Hi. This is a debug code cleanup patch: It removes most of the FvwmPager debug code (very old), also removing useless debug code from fvwmsignal.c and fvmwsignal.h. It also removes an unused #define from

Re: debug vs fvwm_debug_msgs

2006-07-06 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 04:22:28PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 02:35:10PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/5/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi. I have found FVWM_DEBUG_MSGS and DEBUG ifdef's

Re: debug code cleanup patch #1

2006-07-06 Thread seventh guardian
On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:20:14PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: Hi. This is a debug code cleanup patch: It removes most of the FvwmPager debug code (very old), also removing useless debug code from fvwmsignal.c and fvmwsignal.h. It also

Re: debug code cleanup patch #1

2006-07-06 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:23:50PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 05:20:14PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: Hi. This is a debug code cleanup patch: It removes most of the FvwmPager debug code (very old), also

CVS domivogt: * Applied debug cleanup patches.

2006-07-06 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: domivogt06/07/06 16:08:31 Modified files: . : ChangeLog NEWS libs : PictureUtils.c fvwmsignal.c fvwmsignal.h modules/FvwmPager: FvwmPager.c Log message: * Applied debug

Re: debug code cleanup patch #1

2006-07-06 Thread Bob Woodside
On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:19, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:23:50PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch looks fine. I'll commit it. By the way, do you have commit privileges for CVS? No, I don't.. Am I ready for

Re: debug code cleanup patch #1

2006-07-06 Thread Dan Espen
Bob Woodside [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:19, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:23:50PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch looks fine. I'll commit it. By the way, do you have commit

Re: debug code cleanup patch #1

2006-07-06 Thread seventh guardian
On 7/7/06, Dan Espen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bob Woodside [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:19, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 08:23:50PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote: On 7/6/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The patch looks fine. I'll commit