Re: Do we still need color-limit/visual options in fvwm?

Thomas Adam writes: > Hi all, > > Just looking through a few things, and I thought I'd ask whether fvwm needs to > stlil support color limiting, and color depths for XServers with less than > TrueColor? > > These days, 24-bit seems to be the standard, and indeed, I've never yet come > across a se

Re: Do we still need color-limit/visual options in fvwm?

On 7 May 2016 14:46, "Thomas Funk" wrote: > > On 05/07/2016 12:40 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Just looking through a few things, and I thought I'd ask whether fvwm needs to >> stlil support color limiting, and color depths for XServers with less than >> TrueColor? >> >> These days,

Re: Do we still need color-limit/visual options in fvwm?

On 05/07/2016 12:40 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: Hi all, Just looking through a few things, and I thought I'd ask whether fvwm needs to stlil support color limiting, and color depths for XServers with less than TrueColor? These days, 24-bit seems to be the standard, and indeed, I've never yet come ac

Do we still need color-limit/visual options in fvwm?

Hi all, Just looking through a few things, and I thought I'd ask whether fvwm needs to stlil support color limiting, and color depths for XServers with less than TrueColor? These days, 24-bit seems to be the standard, and indeed, I've never yet come across a server still using only 256 colours.