-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 begin quotation from Vincent Lefevre (in <20150219170837.ga18...@xvii.vinc17.org>): > On 2015-02-19 16:20:55 +0000, Thomas Adam wrote: > > This looks as though it was "fixed" by being commented out. Note that > > this is not desirable and as the person who seems to have introduced > > the bug, I might look into it at some point in the future. > > > > What is it you're expecting in terms of confirmation? It'll be in the > > next FVWM release whenever that is. > > I thought that there could be a backport for 2.6.5 (which is what > Debian is using). Because of this bug, I'm still using an old fvwm > version.
That would be cool - I pinned fvwm at the wheezy version for the time being. Having a newer version would be charming. cu AW - -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet) Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU6FXNAAoJEENYfBy4DUs+4jAP/03iI0NGp/xfhkQC/TaJ/paM RWoE3Sbn62j9XL4C1Q3qHW9hkJFNKYaOIDIIjkdoZsNxy83PejSHDL0G/LzUBurK 9r7YjBJmeXxRb0Lx9YoAd/s2orPwlvtR2W6MmgoQrYgxOHUVqOZkjpBcVyMgOiVu CxvRYEQQvo/moO7XBkipkv7y2GbV3klsOst9CABRpH392doL2AFbT8CJDwuBL+DX sWNYjvtcuS6NvygaxYCBBQllN1qV3a/fRD3j6k3ToDk8mqY3Ns2PCEh7zYTZlgJc lGtogQltQY2gOz+R5p/62IX4ELvjRmPz1Se9KUzC3TMCDDwzjfo9GYW1pRpOd2S3 egpwnPwmhU5MiamnKUqc6nf20PWGiRxM/uQMQ/XHPktGuBRa0ruGg+2T6ZgXzo7v +3RrLIe9zG0b0SXJaR2y5HE+b6pDfYC9znLB0nt7PDn4FxJcsaUjiI++TEUpI7CF YQG5vZCzzWRptAf1wF/6+GjhfyFbj16q+WVl57F8ORH5dr7jKo/USZ0Sb7jtXPiK H2hvUnnXe36/dWKJh5nREUxD2c+dAkNiqsGFkRMufSmGzyYssmIYch8sl3LUVEL+ F/7VgnZHkJ2fLSPf2sheKg1e/zhtvmPqccfhrUdu8tFJQAgYg24o50QOqn3JuPq7 otC54709gnUtefq3iKHn =7MXK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----