> "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
DV> I'd prefer not to build a new package but to release the pre-release as
DV> 2.4 and simply re-tag the cvs sources.
Just let me know what you'd like me to do.
- J<
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at http://www.fvwm.org/>.
To unsubscribe from the list,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 02:41:22PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 27 Jun 2001 10:52:38 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > To save a bit of time before the 2.4 release on one hand, and to
> > make sure all the dates and release numbers are correct in all
> > the files I suggest that we build f
On 27 Jun 2001 10:52:38 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> To save a bit of time before the 2.4 release on one hand, and to
> make sure all the dates and release numbers are correct in all
> the files I suggest that we build fvwm-2.4.0-pre1 now with all
> the version numbers and supporting files refer
Dominik Vogt writes:
> To save a bit of time before the 2.4 release on one hand, and to
> make sure all the dates and release numbers are correct in all
> the files I suggest that we build fvwm-2.4.0-pre1 now with all
> the version numbers and supporting files referring to 2.4.0.
> This build woul
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:52:38AM +0200, fvwm-workers wrote:
> To save a bit of time before the 2.4 release on one hand, and to
> make sure all the dates and release numbers are correct in all
> the files I suggest that we build fvwm-2.4.0-pre1 now with all
> the version numbers and supporting fil
To save a bit of time before the 2.4 release on one hand, and to
make sure all the dates and release numbers are correct in all
the files I suggest that we build fvwm-2.4.0-pre1 now with all
the version numbers and supporting files referring to 2.4.0.
This build would not be announced on the web pa