On 11 Feb 2006 00:50:13 +0100, Viktor Griph wrote: > > Currently EdgeScroll divides pixel steps>1000 by 1000 and enables wrap. I > belive this to be a bug (and is reportd as sush (#3162)). However, it is > useful to allow for warps when using pixel steps as well, so just removing > that ability is no good solution. > > One possible solution would be to add another way of specifying wraps to > the syntax, and make it the required method for pixel sizes (or change > the check with pixels so that the size has to be larger than the screen > width, and an even multiplicand of 1000, in order for division to take > place (for compability with configs using for example EdgeScroll 1024000p > 768000p)).
I think the intention was to only divide the percentage values by 1000 (the ones without "p" suffix). This is also what the man page says. So, "EdgeScroll 1024p 768p" should be fixed not to wrap. > I can think of several possible syntaxes, and can't decide on which one is > best. One can either add a prefix (or another suffix) option 'w' to the > individual coordinates. (w1024p or (1024pw or 1024wp)), or one can add > optional keywords to the EdgeScroll syntax after the step parameters. > (i.e. EdgeScroll 1024p 768p wrap|wrapx|wrapy) The last option seems better to me, although I don't think this is really needed, anyone may achieve this now if he specifies 100% or 50%. Regards, Mikhael.
