On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:18:19PM -0500, parv wrote:
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote fvwm-w thusly...
It is sad that I have to ask. What do you think about allowing
only members to post on the fvwm mailing lists in the future? The
amount of spam has got out of control.
I am too
It is sad that I have to ask. What do you think about allowing
only members to post on the fvwm mailing lists in the future? The
amount of spam has got out of control.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send
* Feb 23 09:14 Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org:
It is sad that I have to ask. What do you think about allowing only
members to post on the fvwm mailing lists in the future? The amount
of spam has got out of control.
I'm all for it. Best would be if the list were modified (non-member
posts
Quoting Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org:
It is sad that I have to ask. What do you think about allowing
only members to post on the fvwm mailing lists in the future? The
amount of spam has got out of control.
How about asking posters to put a keyword in the subject line? Mails could be
On 23 Feb 2004 15:02:01 +0100, Uwe Pross wrote:
Quoting Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org:
It is sad that I have to ask. What do you think about allowing
only members to post on the fvwm mailing lists in the future? The
amount of spam has got out of control.
How about asking
Dominik Vogt fvwm-workers@fvwm.org writes:
It is sad that I have to ask. What do you think about allowing
only members to post on the fvwm mailing lists in the future? The
amount of spam has got out of control.
I agree, it is very sad.
Since I applied the SA rule that I posted, nothing has
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote fvwm-w thusly...
It is sad that I have to ask. What do you think about allowing
only members to post on the fvwm mailing lists in the future? The
amount of spam has got out of control.
I am too (or is that five) in agreement. In any case, i would
rather
