Re: voting for the new fvwm logo?

2003-09-04 Thread Kingsly John
+++ Uwe Pross [2003-09-03 13:14:48]: It is a matter of time. Most times I took one image which seems to me represent the logos and scaled it down. For some authors I used gimp to make a overview image from more than one logo. But this is quite much work. I think montage from ImageMagick

CVS olicha: * Added E.18, added comments on C.9 and C.15

2003-09-04 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm Changes by: olicha 03/09/04 01:48:42 Modified files: . : ChangeLog todo-2.6 Log message: * Added E.18, added comments on C.9 and C.15 -- Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/. To unsubscribe

Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Uwe Pross
Hi there, Sun1000 sent me the logo at http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg in private. The submission is belated and I don't like to put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course, but it is not a logo actually. If someone thinks this logo should be added I will do

Re: Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:09:25AM +0200, Uwe Pross wrote: Hi there, Sun1000 sent me the logo at http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg in private. The submission is belated and I don't like to put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course, but it is not a

Re: Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 04 Sep 2003 11:09:25 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote: Sun1000 sent me the logo at http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg in private. The submission is belated and I don't like to put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course, but it is not a logo actually. If

Re: Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Tim Phipps
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:09, Uwe Pross wrote: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course, It's hilarious but it's not a logo. I think it should go on the web page somewhere, maybe the cats page (erm - maybe not). How about a

Re Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Tim Phipps
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 10:09, Uwe Pross wrote: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~uwp/fvwm_grill.jpg put this picture on the web site. It is funny, of course, It's hilarious, but it's not a logo. I think it should go on the web page somewhere, maybe the cats page (erm - maybe not). How about a

Re: Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Uwe Pross
Hi there, On 04 Sep 2003 at 11:53:25 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote: I guess this wasn't seriously meant as a logo. In any case, unless we officially extend the submission period, we can not accept new logo submissions. This would not be fair towards the people who submitted their logos in time

Re: Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Uwe Pross
Hi there, On 04 Sep 2003 at 13:10:17 +0300, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: You may add it to the other fvwm related art of this artist section, like it is done for Phil Harper. I'll do so. BTW, This is exactly why I think the artist is more important then any his specific logo, a good artist may

Re: Logo submission

2003-09-04 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 04 Sep 2003 13:32:55 +0200, Uwe Pross wrote: I see your point and I think too that voting for the artist first and afterwards for a logo will simplify the logo procedure. But how about if you have two artists. One made a lot of quite nice logos and the other made a couple of ugly ones