On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 05:13:36PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 19 Mar 2004 16:29:09 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
on 1-Jan-2004 You fixed a vulnerability in fvwm-menu-directory.in
that allowed an attacker to execute commands with the rights of
the fvwm user. I have backported it to
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:49:51PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
DE == Dan Espen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DE Just checked my home and work Linux machines, same problem.
Do the Linux machines share a common CVS version? The server is
running 1.11.1p1 plus security patches. This
Hi Dominik,
This post:
http://www.hpc.uh.edu/fvwm/archive/0403/msg00054.html
contains my modified patch for window-specific key/mouse bindings.
I hadn't planned to make any further modifications, but if there's
something you'd like me to change just say so ...
The initial patch (with an
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 03:40:15PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
DE == Dan Espen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DE I see the cvspserver port 2401 is open. I tried to telnet to that
DE port, but so far it's hanging just like it does when I try CVS.
Still can't find anything wrong; just did
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 10:58:24AM +0200, fvwm-workers wrote:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:49:51PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
DE == Dan Espen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DE Just checked my home and work Linux machines, same problem.
Do the Linux machines share a common CVS
I just found a typo in the manpage.
if the window being placed has the EWMHPlacemenÂ
tUseWoringArea style and windows with an EWMH strut
^^^
Best regards
Jochen
--
Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/.
To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm-workers
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:48:24AM +0100, Stephan Beyer wrote:
If it's a feature, and not a bug, please tell me why the FvwmGtk manual
page isn't installed on my system... ;)
It's only installed if FvwmGtk is installed too.
FvwmGtk is installed too, of course...
Ah, forget my
