On 11 Feb 2006 09:50:34 -0600, FVWM CVS (Dominik) wrote:
>
> * Committed UnderMousePlacement patch.
Will we apply new patches without any discussion now? :)
I think this patch was better (both the name and the functionality):
http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@hpc.uh.edu/msg05522.html
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt06/02/11 09:58:42
Modified files:
modules: ChangeLog
modules/FvwmDragWell: xdndDragSource.c
Log message:
* FQueryPointer fix.
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt06/02/11 09:54:47
Modified files:
fvwm : placement.c
Log message:
* Fixed interpretation of FQueryPointer return code.
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt06/02/11 09:50:34
Modified files:
. : AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS
fvwm : fvwm.1.in fvwm.h placement.c style.c
Log message:
* Committed UnderMousePlacement patch.
On Sat, Feb 11, 2006 at 01:14:57PM +0100, Arwed von Merkatz wrote:
> giving it another try to get this patch applied :)
> It adds a new placement mode 'UnderMousePlacement' to fvwm, placing new
> windows centered under the current cursor position. I've been using this
> for over a year now without
On 11 Feb 2006 02:08:55 +, seventh guardian wrote:
>
> On 2/11/06, Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Another serious problem with this suggestion is that now we start to
> > manipulate with strings like "ColourTable" or "MonitorPanel" and have no
> > any idea whether they are
Hi,
giving it another try to get this patch applied :)
It adds a new placement mode 'UnderMousePlacement' to fvwm, placing new
windows centered under the current cursor position. I've been using this
for over a year now without problems.
--
Arwed v. Merkatz Source Ma
On 2/11/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:37:51PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
> > On 2/10/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:03:09PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > > I happende to step on this when I was tryin
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:37:51PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
> On 2/10/06, Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:03:09PM +, seventh guardian wrote:
> > > I happende to step on this when I was trying the wiki:
> > >
> > > DV> What about the future? Well, th
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt06/02/11 02:58:26
Modified files:
docs : DEVELOPERS FAQ
utils : ChangeLog Makefile.am
Added files:
utils : changelog.vim
Log message:
* Added a ChangeLog mode
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
On 11 Feb 2006 00:50:13 +0100, Viktor Griph wrote:
Currently EdgeScroll divides pixel steps>1000 by 1000 and enables wrap. I
belive this to be a bug (and is reportd as sush (#3162)). However, it is
useful to allow for warps when using pixel steps as
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: domivogt06/02/11 02:38:37
Modified files:
docs : CONVENTIONS
modules: ChangeLog
modules/FvwmForm: FvwmForm.c
modules/FvwmGtk: FvwmGtk.c
modules/FvwmIdent: FvwmI
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: griph 06/02/11 02:15:48
Modified files:
. : NEWS ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.1.in virtual.c
Log message:
* fixed EdgeScroll dividing pixels by 1000
* added wrap|wrapx|wrapy option to EdgeScrol
13 matches
Mail list logo