yet another documentation fixes

2006-03-28 Thread Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov
  Greetings everyone,

As promised, I found and corrected another bunch of typos and other
inconsistencies in the docs. Apply against the latest CVS sources of the
2.5 branch. But that's not all, more will follow when I find time to
check remaining part of the docs. See you later.

-- 
Serge Koksharov, Free Software user  supporter
GPG public key ID: 0x3D330896 (pgp.mit.edu)
Key fingerprint: 5BC4 0475 CB03 6A31 0076  82C2 C240 72F0 3D33 0896


fvwmCVS_docs.patch.gz
Description: application/gunzip


Re: yet another documentation fixes

2006-03-28 Thread Thomas Adam
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:21:05AM +0400, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov wrote:
   Greetings everyone,

 As promised, I found and corrected another bunch of typos and other
 inconsistencies in the docs. Apply against the latest CVS sources of
 the 2.5 branch. But that's not all, more will follow when I find time
 to check remaining part of the docs. See you later.

There's a mistake in one of your fixes:

@@ -36,7 +68,7 @@
* sample.fvwmrc/system.fvwm2rc-sample-1:
replaced all mentions of `rsh' with `ssh'. rsh is obsolete and
inherently insecure. We shouldn't teach our users bad things,
-   should we?
+   shouldn't we?

The phrase:  We shouldn't teach our users bad things, should we? is the
correct one.  The negation of NOT teaching the users bad things has
already been done.  It is neither correct English or grammatically
correct to say:

We shouldn't teach our users bad things, shouldn't we?

I need to review some of your other fixes --- whilst you've made a
fantastic effort in doing so, I can already see one or two technical
mistakes that need changing.  I'll have to apply this patch and somehow
reverse engineer your changes.

But thank you ever so much for your efforts.

-- Thomas Adam

--  
I've been too honest with myself, I should have lied like everybody else.



Re: yet another documentation fixes

2006-03-28 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 02:21:05AM +0400, Serge (gentoosiast) Koksharov wrote
 :
Greetings everyone,
 
  As promised, I found and corrected another bunch of typos and other
  inconsistencies in the docs. Apply against the latest CVS sources of
  the 2.5 branch. But that's not all, more will follow when I find time
  to check remaining part of the docs. See you later.
 
 There's a mistake in one of your fixes:
 
 @@ -36,7 +68,7 @@
 * sample.fvwmrc/system.fvwm2rc-sample-1:
 replaced all mentions of `rsh' with `ssh'. rsh is obsolete and
 inherently insecure. We shouldn't teach our users bad things,
 -   should we?
 +   shouldn't we?
 
 The phrase:  We shouldn't teach our users bad things, should we? is the
 correct one.  The negation of NOT teaching the users bad things has
 already been done.  It is neither correct English or grammatically
 correct to say:
 
 We shouldn't teach our users bad things, shouldn't we?

Check what got checked in.  I made a fix in that area.

 I need to review some of your other fixes --- whilst you've made a
 fantastic effort in doing so, I can already see one or two technical
 mistakes that need changing.  I'll have to apply this patch and somehow
 reverse engineer your changes.
 
 But thank you ever so much for your efforts.

Gee, I hope all the mistakes aren't my fault.

-- 
Dan Espen   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]