CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 06:48:09
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.c
libs : alloca.c
Log message:
Removed old debug code from alloca.c
Corrected a minor typo in fvwm.c
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: griph 06/07/08 08:03:28
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog NEWS configure.ac
Log message:
added EXEEXT to FvwmGtk to work under Cygwin. (bug #3772)
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: griph 06/07/08 09:42:17
Modified files:
. : Tag: branch-2_4 ChangeLog NEWS configure.in
modules: Tag: branch-2_4 ChangeLog
modules/FvwmConsole: Tag: branch-2_4 FvwmConsoleC.c
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 09:57:42
fvwm/compat
Update of /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat
In directory util9.math.uh.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv3957/compat
Log Message:
Directory /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat added to the repository
On 7/8/06, FVWM CVS fvwm-workers@fvwm.org wrote:
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 09:57:42
fvwm/compat
Update of /home/cvs/fvwm/fvwm/compat
In directory util9.math.uh.edu:/tmp/cvs-serv3957/compat
Log Message:
Directory
Hi.
What do you think of separating the compatibility code (replacement
functions) from libfvwm?
Functions like strncasecmp or strdup are spread all over the code. For
systems that do not have them availiable, libfvwm is responsible for
providing them. But the question is, should this be the
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
Module name: fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/07 18:34:31
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.1.in fvwm.c
Log message:
Removed the warning about the
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:58:46PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
What do you think of separating the compatibility code (replacement
functions) from libfvwm?
Functions like strncasecmp or strdup are spread all over the code. For
systems that do not have them availiable, libfvwm is
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
Module name: fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/07 18:34:31
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
fvwm : fvwm.1.in fvwm.c
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:58:46PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
Hi.
What do you think of separating the compatibility code (replacement
functions) from libfvwm?
Functions like strncasecmp or strdup are spread all over the code. For
On 7/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
Module name: fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/07 18:34:31
Modified files:
.
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm
Module name:fvwm
Changes by: renato 06/07/08 17:55:21
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog
Log message:
Corrected a mistake in a previous entry of ChangeLog
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:48:43PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
CVSROOT: /home/cvs/fvwm
Module name: fvwm
Changes
On 7/9/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 11:48:43PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 7/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 06:34:31PM -0500, fvwm-workers wrote:
CVSROOT:
14 matches
Mail list logo