Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-23 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: > On 23 March 2016 at 22:21, Dan Espen wrote: >> I think we're embarking on a lot of work. > > Which aspect, specifically? Note that if you're referring just to the > website, then you might be right---I don't know enough about HTML/CSS

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On 23 March 2016 at 22:21, Dan Espen wrote: > I think we're embarking on a lot of work. Which aspect, specifically? Note that if you're referring just to the website, then you might be right---I don't know enough about HTML/CSS to make that call. However, it requires

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-23 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:16:13PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> Moving the Fvwm-web source to Github won't help if we still need to >> publish using Jason's services. > > So I've taken a look at this, and have noted the following: > > * PHP is used to

CVS dane fvwm-web: * download/index.php:

2016-03-23 Thread FVWM CVS
CVSROOT:/home/cvs/fvwm Module name:fvwm-web Changes by: dane16/03/23 17:16:57 Modified files: . : ChangeLog download : index.php Log message: * download/index.php: Correctly remove reference to snapshots. Remove "which package should you