Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-25 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:42:12PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 24 Mar 2003 15:42:35 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: With no discussion going on anymore, do we all agree on the competition rules draft in cvs? What about the schedule? I would not add a Prize section. Although it may be

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-24 Thread Dominik Vogt
With no discussion going on anymore, do we all agree on the competition rules draft in cvs? What about the schedule? Bye Dominik ^_^ ^_^ -- Visit the official FVWM web page at URL:http://www.fvwm.org/. To unsubscribe from the list, send unsubscribe fvwm-workers in the body of a message to

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-24 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 24 Mar 2003 15:42:35 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: With no discussion going on anymore, do we all agree on the competition rules draft in cvs? What about the schedule? I would not add a Prize section. Although it may be no problem for someone to take out of a pocket 100 euro (I don't know),

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-17 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 03:35:45AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 17 Mar 2003 00:17:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, here is a dramatically stripped down version of the rules with most of the nitpicking removed. On the issue how to contribute: we could simply register a free

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-16 Thread dominik . vogt
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:17:27PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: This thread is meant to contain all discussions about the planned logo competition. Please keep unrelated topics out of this thread. To begin with, you can find my first draft of the logo competition rules below. When you replay,

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 13 Mar 2003 22:17:27 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fvwm Logo Competition Rules --- *** DRAFT *** !!! (give a short explanation what fvwm is and why it needs a new logo) 1. Competition Schedule * The logo competition begins on 15th of

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-16 Thread Dominik Vogt
On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:17:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 13 Mar 2003 22:17:27 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fvwm Logo Competition Rules --- *** DRAFT *** !!! (give a short explanation what fvwm is and why it needs a new logo)

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 16 Mar 2003 15:32:28 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:17:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 13 Mar 2003 22:17:27 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fvwm Logo Competition Rules --- *** DRAFT *** !!! (give a short

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-16 Thread Dan Espen
Mikhael Goikhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 16 Mar 2003 15:32:28 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:17:45PM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: On 13 Mar 2003 22:17:27 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fvwm Logo Competition Rules Judging by the last time we

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-16 Thread Mikhael Goikhman
On 17 Mar 2003 00:17:07 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, here is a dramatically stripped down version of the rules with most of the nitpicking removed. On the issue how to contribute: we could simply register a free mail account somewhere and share the password. This way any of the

Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-13 Thread dominik . vogt
This thread is meant to contain all discussions about the planned logo competition. Please keep unrelated topics out of this thread. To begin with, you can find my first draft of the logo competition rules below. When you replay, please quote only the sections you are referring to. The current

Re: Logo-Competition planning thread

2003-03-13 Thread parv
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote [EMAIL PROTECTED] thusly... ... 6. The winner * The winning logo will be shipped with the fvwm distribution (hopefully in 2.6.0) and used as: ... !!!prize? Prize? What prize? Isn't the logo being part of FVMW a prize in itself? (Rhetorical