Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the
effects of the
On 8/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward
seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/23/06, Jacob Bachmeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a possibility for 3.0, could the module interface be reworked perhaps
more extensively?
I had an idea for an ICE-based module interface that would, if well
done, be more flexible and extensible than the current
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006 at 12:07:40AM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
[snip]
But there is a soulution. Extend the config win packet with a
flag that indicated whether a window can be moved by the user,
i.e. the return code of the function that determines whether the
window can be moved or not.
I'm
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of
changes
to the window flags of a window? Currently FvwmPager allows moving of
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of
changes
to the window flags of a
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows
On 8/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 8/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the effects
of the above VISIBLE changes there could be provided a command that
the modules could use to request an alias. This way the module would
parse the command line alias
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the
effects of the above VISIBLE changes there could be provided a
command that the modules could
On 8/8/06, Thomas Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the
effects of the above VISIBLE changes there could
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:18:41PM +0100, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the effects
of the above VISIBLE changes there could be provided a command that
the modules could use to request
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and minimizing the
effects of the above VISIBLE
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:31:00PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 16:18:41 +0100
seventh guardian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/8/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a way to provide backward compatibility and
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of changes
to the window flags of a window? Currently FvwmPager allows moving of
FixedPosition mini-windows, but the main window does not move. Just
checking for IS_FIXED in MoveWindow doesn't work if the FixedPosition flag
was
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 07:26:40PM +0200, Viktor Griph wrote:
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Dominik Vogt wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of changes
to the window flags of a window? Currently FvwmPager allows moving of
FixedPosition mini-windows, but the main
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of changes
to the window flags of a window? Currently FvwmPager allows moving of
FixedPosition mini-windows, but the main window does not move. Just
checking for IS_FIXED in
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, seventh guardian wrote:
On 8/7/06, Dominik Vogt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way that the module interface allows keeping track of
changes
to the window flags of a window? Currently FvwmPager allows moving of
FixedPosition mini-windows, but the main window does
19 matches
Mail list logo
