On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 05:55:38PM +0400, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 02:14:57PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On 16 September 2010 13:50, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> > > Removing the offending line fixes the problem.
> >
> > Thanks. I had to copy and paste what looked like your Ch
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 02:14:57PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On 16 September 2010 13:50, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> > Removing the offending line fixes the problem.
>
> Thanks. I had to copy and paste what looked like your Changelog
> entry. Annoyingly. Please read up on how we accept patches h
On 16 September 2010 13:50, Sergey Vlasov wrote:
> Removing the offending line fixes the problem.
Thanks. I had to copy and paste what looked like your Changelog
entry. Annoyingly. Please read up on how we accept patches here.
If there's another bug that crops up with this again, be warned I
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:16:03 +0200 Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
> playing around with FvwmProxy, I discovered that the proxied window only
> moved right- and down-wards when dragging the proxy window.
> The move commands sent by FvwmProxy for dragging left- and upwards are
> of the form (from a log fil
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 08:16:03AM +0200, Gerard Vermeulen wrote:
> The attached patch provides a fix (one can infer from the manual that
> 'Move w+-5p w+-2p' should be valid).
Possibly -- although it's not intuitive at all, so if it turns out this
breaks people's configs, I'll rework it.
But for
Hi,
playing around with FvwmProxy, I discovered that the proxied window only
moved right- and down-wards when dragging the proxy window.
The move commands sent by FvwmProxy for dragging left- and upwards are
of the form (from a log file of my login manager 'slim'):
07:14:51 1 [fvwm][LOG]: M:
