On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 10:14:58AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2002 12:06:58 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:32:54AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't think we need another send patch/comment on patch/apply patch
> > > round. :) I will
On 13 Sep 2002 12:06:58 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:32:54AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> >
> > I don't think we need another send patch/comment on patch/apply patch
> > round. :) I will commit the fix.
>
> Hey, it would have taken me just about 2 minutes to do t
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 09:32:54AM +, Mikhael Goikhman wrote:
> On 13 Sep 2002 11:24:50 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> >
> > > I might be pursuaded to submit another patch if you'd like. :)
> >
> > Sure. Everything I don't have to do myself is very welcome :)
> > Basically you just have to cop
On 13 Sep 2002 11:24:50 +0200, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>
> > I might be pursuaded to submit another patch if you'd like. :)
>
> Sure. Everything I don't have to do myself is very welcome :)
> Basically you just have to copy the "#ifndef __attribute__" chunk
> from libs/fvwmlib.h in the 2.4 branch to
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 05:37:58PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> > "Dominik" == Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dominik> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:01:22PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
[snip]
> >> Speaking of cvs access, however, wasn't it possible in the past to browse
> >> the cvs
> "PS" == Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> If you're setting it up from scratch I suggest you go with viewcvs
PS> instead of cvsweb;
Yep; I was looking at either that or Chora (www.horde.org/chora). I
think I prefer Chora, honestly, and I already run the Horde suite here
for webma
If you're setting it up from scratch I suggest you go with viewcvs
instead of cvsweb; the former is nicer (and, unless things have changed
recently, much better supported):
http://viewcvs.sourceforge.net/
--
---
Paul
> "CH" == Charles Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CH> Jason, does the cvsweb stuff for fvwm still exist anywhere by any
CH> chance?
No, it doesn't. It never survived the last CVS server move. As I'll
be moving it again anyway, I may try to get something like cvsweb
going again then.
- J
> "Dominik" == Dominik Vogt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dominik> On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:01:22PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
>> I'd hardly constitute this piddly little patch as my return to fvwm
>> development. :)
Dominik> A little prodding never hurts :-)
True. :)
And hopefully I shall
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 02:01:22PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> > "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
>
> DV> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 02:27:20PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> ...
> >> I finially got around to looking into this problem, and turned out that
> >> finding where the problem and coming u
> "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
DV> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 02:27:20PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
...
>> I finially got around to looking into this problem, and turned out that
>> finding where the problem and coming up with a workable fix was actually
>> rather easy:
DV> And it's the right
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 02:27:20PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> > "Me" == Charles Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ...
> Me> If you don't get a chance to look into it, I'll try again myself later
> Me> today (or tonight at home if I remember to mail this little testcase back
> Me> there)
> "Me" == Charles Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
Me> If you don't get a chance to look into it, I'll try again myself later
Me> today (or tonight at home if I remember to mail this little testcase back
Me> there).
I finially got around to looking into this problem, and turned out that
> "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
DV> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:03:43AM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
DV> It's a bit hard to get the pointer out of the Xnest window without
DV> moving the mouse. Most of the time it's more trouble than using
DV> debug fprintfs.
Alright, I see the problem now...
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 11:03:43AM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> > "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
>
> DV> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:20:27AM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> >> Don't you use something like VNC, Xnest, or XMX when doing your debugging?
> >> Should be able to use that to run fvwm un
> "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
DV> On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:20:27AM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
>> Don't you use something like VNC, Xnest, or XMX when doing your debugging?
>> Should be able to use that to run fvwm under a debugger to debug focus
>> problems about as "easily" as any other
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 10:20:27AM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
Content-Description: message body and .signature
> > "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
>
> DV> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:39:41PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> >> I switched to v2.4.9 the other day (from v2.4.3) and noticed this odd
>
> "Me" == Charles Hines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Me> I'll do one better. I've attached a version of a dirt simple X11 (Xt)
Me> program that someone else posted to the list once to demonstrate another
Me> problem, modified to essentially contain the same changes that I did to
Me> xbuffy.
M
> "DV" == Dominik Vogt writes:
DV> On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:39:41PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
>> I switched to v2.4.9 the other day (from v2.4.3) and noticed this odd
>> thing... I use a modified version of xbuffy (v3.3) that I changed to never
>> take the focus (since it pops up a new w
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:39:41PM -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
> I switched to v2.4.9 the other day (from v2.4.3) and noticed this odd thing...
> I use a modified version of xbuffy (v3.3) that I changed to never take the
> focus (since it pops up a new window briefly when mail comes in), and after
> "Mikhael" == Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mikhael> On 29 Aug 2002 17:39:41 -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
>> I switched to v2.4.9 the other day (from v2.4.3) and noticed this odd
>> thing... I use a modified version of xbuffy (v3.3) that I changed to
>> never take the focus (si
On 29 Aug 2002 17:39:41 -0400, Charles Hines wrote:
>
> I switched to v2.4.9 the other day (from v2.4.3) and noticed this odd
> thing... I use a modified version of xbuffy (v3.3) that I changed to
> never take the focus (since it pops up a new window briefly when mail
> comes in), and after switch
Howdy all.
I switched to v2.4.9 the other day (from v2.4.3) and noticed this odd thing...
I use a modified version of xbuffy (v3.3) that I changed to never take the
focus (since it pops up a new window briefly when mail comes in), and after
switching to v2.4.9 I noticed the focus appearing to cha
23 matches
Mail list logo
