GTK and fvwm do not always play nice together

2007-12-02 Thread Tom Horsley
There seems to be a problem with GTK and fvwm sometimes not getting along. I first mentioned this in the fvwm list a while back: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg15827.html which eventually led to this somewhat silly idea: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL

Re: GTK and fvwm do not always play nice together

2007-12-02 Thread Tom Horsley
There seems to be a problem with GTK and fvwm sometimes not getting along. Additional research shows there is a gnome bugzilla on this as well, which contains a small test program that reproduces the bug, so it is even simpler to recreate than running gnucash:

Re: GTK and fvwm do not always play nice together

2007-12-03 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:37:06 +0100 (CET) Viktor Griph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've commited a fix for the dissappearing Windows. And I just built the CVS version, and the fix does indeed work. All the test cases no longer have disappearing windows. Thanks!

Re: FVWM: WM_NAME versus _NET_WM_NAME

2012-09-17 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:09:19 +0200 Viktor Griph wrote: 2012/9/17 Tom Horsley horsley1...@gmail.com: I found a thread in the archives from back in 2009 saying this issue was fixed: http://www.mail-archive.com/fvwm-workers@fvwm.org/msg01957.html Yet in fedora 17, GIMP sets WM_NAME

Re: FVWM: fvwm development

2012-11-30 Thread Tom Horsley
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 14:06:36 +0100 Adam Sjøgren wrote: I think it would be much more accurate to call FVWM mature. An even better word is useful (unlike many linux products under frenetic active development by folks who believe change is always good no matter how stupid it is :-).

Re: FVWM: [Draft] New Configuration Format

2016-09-19 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:38:04 +0200 Bert Geens wrote: > Hello fellow Fvwm users, > > Thomas has started working on a draft for a new configuration format > that should fix some of the shortcomings of the current one. There are no shortcomings in the current format :-). It has the overwhelmingly