On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:40:12PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> I haven't done any analysis of other areas of the repo though.
The modules/* directory comes out as:
80% changed, versus 20% original (so about a fifth overall still untouched).
A lot of this will be man pages, and boilerplate
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 08:07:56PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> So we could go down this route---indeed, I see nothing wrong with the analysis
> at any rate.
So back of the envelope calculation, just limited to $git_repo/fvwm/*, I
calculate the following:
$ for i in *; do; c="$(git --no-pager
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 08:58:30PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 07:41:24PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 08:47:15PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > I don't see how this is fixable without either removing all of
> > > Rob's code or changing Github's
> "TA" == Thomas Adam writes:
TA> Gitlab might be an option, but that would require me to set the
TA> infrastructure up there again -- something I'm not willing to do at
TA> all. Frankly, we lose more than we gain.
I guess it depends on what you want; there are plenty of
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 07:41:24PM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 08:47:15PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > I don't see how this is fixable without either removing all of
> > Rob's code or changing Github's terms and conditions. I see no
> > problems between D.4 and D.5 and
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 08:47:15PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> I don't see how this is fixable without either removing all of
> Rob's code or changing Github's terms and conditions. I see no
> problems between D.4 and D.5 and the GPL though.
Gitlab might be an option, but that would require me
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:24:45AM +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:48:30AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 13:55 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > > There is a discussion about Github's new terms of service which may
> > > not be compatible with the Gpl:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 09:48:30AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 13:55 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > There is a discussion about Github's new terms of service which may
> > not be compatible with the Gpl:
> > https://www.mirbsd.org/permalinks/wlog-10_e20170301-tg.htm
> >
On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 13:55 +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> There is a discussion about Github's new terms of service which may
> not be compatible with the Gpl:
> https://www.mirbsd.org/permalinks/wlog-10_e20170301-tg.htm
>
> I didn't have time to read the new terms yet, but it is possible
> that