Re: Removing colour map support

2016-10-17 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:53:46PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> The last time I've had a system where private colourmap support
> was useful was back in 1991 or so.  Many people nowadays probably
> don't even know what it is:  On systems with a limited number of
> colours (anybody remembers graphics cards that could only display
> 256 colours in parallel) every window could have its own set of
> colours to use, and when it got the focus, that map would be
> installed, rendering all other windows in funny colours.
> 
> I've honestly no ideas if there are still applications around that
> do that (Netscape was one).  Is there a reason to keep it?

I asked about this months ago.  I think Dan said there was perhaps an aging
Sun machine somewhere which needed it; presumably also running Netscape4, or
more likely Moasic.

I say remove it.

-- Thomas Adam



Removing colour map support

2016-10-17 Thread Dominik Vogt
The last time I've had a system where private colourmap support
was useful was back in 1991 or so.  Many people nowadays probably
don't even know what it is:  On systems with a limited number of
colours (anybody remembers graphics cards that could only display
256 colours in parallel) every window could have its own set of
colours to use, and when it got the focus, that map would be
installed, rendering all other windows in funny colours.

I've honestly no ideas if there are still applications around that
do that (Netscape was one).  Is there a reason to keep it?

Ciao

Dominik ^_^  ^_^

-- 

Dominik Vogt