Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-04 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "TA" == Thomas Adam writes: TA> I say we trial this, as it's the simplest change, without additional TA> overhead, and we are then directly able to tweak things as we see TA> fit. OK, I'll stick the appropriate A record into DNS shortly. It may, of course, take a while

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-04 Thread Thomas Adam
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:56:47AM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > https://help.github.com/articles/using-a-custom-domain-with-github-pages/ > https://help.github.com/articles/setting-up-your-pages-site-repository/ I say we trial this, as it's the simplest change, without additional overhead, and

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-04 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "JS" == Jaimos Skriletz writes: > > JS> So to complete the switch the fvwm.org domain needs to be pointed > JS> at/redirected to github.io. > > That's easy for me to do, but

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-04 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JS" == Jaimos Skriletz writes: JS> So to complete the switch the fvwm.org domain needs to be pointed JS> at/redirected to github.io. That's easy for me to do, but before I make any changes. JS> I think pointing fvwm.org at github would be preferable as

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-03 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:45:22PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > > Jaimos Skriletz writes: > > > > > Also I am unsure if these various markdown files, FAQ.md, AUTHORS.md, > > > DEVELOPERS.md, etc

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-02 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 02:45:22PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Jaimos Skriletz writes: > > > Also I am unsure if these various markdown files, FAQ.md, AUTHORS.md, > > DEVELOPERS.md, etc should be located and maintained on the webpage or > > in $FVWM.GIT source. I

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-02 Thread Thomas Adam
On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 11:58:41AM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 02:47:24PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > > > ​​ > > > > Thanks! It looks really good. We can remove the Changelog section;

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-02 Thread Dan Espen
Jaimos Skriletz writes: > Also I am unsure if these various markdown files, FAQ.md, AUTHORS.md, > DEVELOPERS.md, etc should be located and maintained on the webpage or > in $FVWM.GIT source. I think either can work with git.io so it is > probably a matter of

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-02 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 02:47:24PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > > ​​ > > Thanks! It looks really good. We can remove the Changelog section; people > can look at the release descriptions and/or Git history from now on. >

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-01 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 02:47:24PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > ​​ > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Jaimos Skriletz < > jaimosskril...@boisestate.edu> wrote: > > > Here is what I have created so far > > > > http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm.org/ > > > > The sources are available on github > > >

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-04-01 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
​​ On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Jaimos Skriletz < jaimosskril...@boisestate.edu> wrote: > Here is what I have created so far > > http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm.org/ > > The sources are available on github > > https://github.com/somiaj/fvwmorg.github.io > > ​Update: ​The site is mostly complete

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-26 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
Here is what I have created so far http://fvwmforums.org/fvwm.org/ ​Jekyll seems to be fairly straight forward for the basics. Once the framework is setup, you can just add/remove files as either .html or .markdown (.md) with a small YAML header. This will then cause the software to generate the

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-26 Thread Thomas Adam
On 26 March 2016 at 01:11, Dan Espen wrote: > My account is named "danespen". I've added you, along with Jaimos as well. My last official act before I move onto a few more important things for a bit. >> Note that I'm getting married this weekend and will then be away on >>

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: R> On 23 March 2016 at 22:21, Dan Espen wrote: > Excellent. Then set yourself up with a Github account, and let me > know your username, and I'll add you to the fvwmorg and you can do > something with the website repository. My account

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:37:50PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > "TA" == Thomas Adam writes: > > TA> I note that it's possible to set up webhooks on repositories on > TA> Github. We could use that mechanism to notify you of changes which > TA> need pulling (and

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "DE" == Dan Espen writes: DE> Not sure why, maybe I paid, but paid for you? Yes, the last time it came up for renewal, you paid for it. We didn't actually transfer the ownership or the registrar. If you want to do that, though, then just let me know what I need to

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "TA" == Thomas Adam writes: TA> I note that it's possible to set up webhooks on repositories on TA> Github. We could use that mechanism to notify you of changes which TA> need pulling (and hence, enact some script to do a git-pull), rather TA> than polling for them. It's

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:43:53PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > OK, a manual pull worked. Turns out that the update script is in my > home directory, which isn't accessible without a kerberos ticket. > That's fixed up. TGTs. Nice! > It's a trivial matter to have this do a git pull

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Dan Espen
Jason L Tibbitts III writes: >> "JS" == Jaimos Skriletz writes: > > JS> who controls the domain name fvwm.org, > > A whois query shows that it's me. Not sure why, maybe I paid, but paid for you? From: Gandi

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 04:00:19PM -0600, Jaimos Skriletz wrote: > Hello, I have offered to help migrate the fvwm.org to something more > maintainable as this is something Thomas was wanting help with in #fvwm. Hi Jaimos, > I am unsure on a lot of the details about how the current site is >

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "JS" == Jaimos Skriletz writes: JS> who controls the domain name fvwm.org, A whois query shows that it's me. - J<

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Jaimos Skriletz
> > Jaimos Skriletz has also expressed an interest in this (I'ev Cced him), and > he'll post here soon about what his thoughts are, etc. Hopefully you and > he > can work together on this. > ​Hello, I have offered to help migrate the fvwm.org to something more maintainable as this is something

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
OK, a manual pull worked. Turns out that the update script is in my home directory, which isn't accessible without a kerberos ticket. That's fixed up. It's a trivial matter to have this do a git pull instead, so if the fvwm-web repository on github is up to date, then just let me know and I'll

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
> "DE" == Dan Espen writes: DE> Meanwhile, I committed fvwm-web changes yesterday, but those changes DE> have not shown up at fvwm.org. Where did you commit them? I'm surprised you could commit at all, given the fact that the CVS server isn't really happy. I'll try to

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 05:21:27PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: Hi Dan, > My first impression, it's Github only. No, not at all. It's a way of generating HTML from static templates, which can be augmented with CSS and extra HTML where necessary. It just so happens that what Github hosting offers,

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:19:18PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> Yep, I'm referring to the web pages. >> I have some CSS based pages at work using themes. >> The themes aren't really important to me, but since >> I doubt GIT is going to give us PHP I think

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-25 Thread Thomas Adam
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 09:19:18PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: > Yep, I'm referring to the web pages. > I have some CSS based pages at work using themes. > The themes aren't really important to me, but since > I doubt GIT is going to give us PHP I think we'll be better off without > the PHP. Have a

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-24 Thread Thomas Adam
On 24 March 2016 at 01:19, Dan Espen wrote: >> Thomas Adam writes: >> See previous paragraph, I do not think this is the right approach at all. > > I don't see the difference. > Right now Jason pulls from CVS to build the pages at fvwm.org. > He said he's

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-23 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: > On 23 March 2016 at 22:21, Dan Espen wrote: >> I think we're embarking on a lot of work. > > Which aspect, specifically? Note that if you're referring just to the > website, then you might be right---I don't know enough about HTML/CSS

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-23 Thread Thomas Adam
On 23 March 2016 at 22:21, Dan Espen wrote: > I think we're embarking on a lot of work. Which aspect, specifically? Note that if you're referring just to the website, then you might be right---I don't know enough about HTML/CSS to make that call. However, it requires

Re: FVWM website: WAS: [Re: FVWM code moved to Github]

2016-03-23 Thread Dan Espen
Thomas Adam writes: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 08:16:13PM -0400, Dan Espen wrote: >> Moving the Fvwm-web source to Github won't help if we still need to >> publish using Jason's services. > > So I've taken a look at this, and have noted the following: > > * PHP is used to