Hi all,
It's works actually, at least for me - R55 HFA-04, R60 and R61 all works
OK under VmWare ESX 2.5.2 and WKS 5.x
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jean-Paul Baillon
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 6:05 AM
We are running NGX on Solaris 9. I believe ISP Redundancy is not
supported here either. Is there any suggestion on how to implement it
in such cases.
Ramki
CCNA, CCSE-NGAI
Roberto Lauriola wrote:
Hi list,
Reading NGX R60 documentation ISP Redundancy on Windows is not possible
and not
Hi all,
It's works actually, at least for me - R55 HFA-04, R60 and R61 all works
OK under VmWare ESX 2.5.2 and WKS 5.x
Define 'works' (...) ?
M.
=
To set vacation, Out-Of-Office, or away messages,
send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in the BODY
Three different development networks with virtuial mnagment servers and
in case of R61 virtual enfircmemnt points..
R55 SPLAT running under ESX acts as secondary managment server in
production.
A.
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jean-Paul Baillon wrote:
Well done then, good for you
I have read numerous forums and mailing lists of those who have tried and
failed.
for vmware, the problem is about scsi emulation. I use LSI logic
emulation and works ok.
Besides I didn't say it won't, I simply stated that I don't
Hi.
Who can continue to help me in a NAT/VPN problem. I have a central and two
external sites.
The central Site IP=192.168.190.0/24. Site A IP=192.168.191.0/24. Site B
IP=192.169.192.0/24.
The two sites are full independently and have only a VPN connection to the
central site. So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
You have to use the one communitie for the the vpn's to both sites and
configure VPN-Routing.
The firewall doesn't know how route the paquet.
Bye
Bachmann, Olaf wrote:
Hi.
Who can continue to help me in a NAT/VPN problem. I have a
We have Cluster XL NGX R61 working on Solaris/Sparc. This is running in
Multicast load sharing mode. The cluster is connected to Catalyst 6500
on both ends.
Recently we lost Internet connectivity on the external 6500 for about 10
minutes. When the connection came back, the routers could not
We have Cluster XL NGX R61 working on Solaris/Sparc. This is running in
Multicast load sharing mode. The cluster is connected to Catalyst 6500
on both ends.
Recently we lost Internet connectivity on the external 6500 for about 10
minutes. When the connection came back, the routers could not
Hello,
we're successfully using LDAP-authentication with Microsoft_AD for our
remote access VPN.
The problem is, that the authenticated users are not listed in SmartView
Monitor. Local authenticated users are displayed, but LDAP authenticated
not.
Does anyone know why this happens or if
Alvaro is correct, you'll need to setup a vpn_route.conf and then push it to
the firewalls. Obviously you'll also need rules that allow traffic between
the nets.
You could also setup a route based vpn in R60 to handle the traffic
automatically.
Jason
On 6/19/06, Alvaro Gastambide [EMAIL
Hello,
we're successfully using LDAP-authentication with Microsoft_AD for our
remote access VPN.
The problem is, that the authenticated users are not listed in SmartView
Monitor. Local authenticated users are displayed, but LDAP authenticated
not.
Does anyone know why this happens or if it is
No,nothing in the logs. We have a static ARP to the multicast mac
address.
S.
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Elsen
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 11:46 AM
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject:
Mark Elsen schrieb:
Hello,
we're successfully using LDAP-authentication with Microsoft_AD for our
remote access VPN.
The problem is, that the authenticated users are not listed in SmartView
Monitor. Local authenticated users are displayed, but LDAP authenticated
not.
Does anyone know why this
14 matches
Mail list logo
