Bernd,
You could give it a try by using Wine (http://www.winehq.org/) and then
follow the
instructions at this location according to the version in use:
http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?iAppId=1067
Of course this is not supported by Checkpoint and it does not do a
full-fledged linux client,
Not that I'm aware of. As always with CP you need a license (or in this case a
subscription) to be able to use/update a component. I have not seen a case
where the signatures could be updated offline.
David Callebaut
Security Engineer
Tel. +32 (0) 2 702 55 49
Mobile. +32 (0) 478 98 08
Hi Satyam,
We don't have VSX but we use standard SNMP to monitor the bytes data
on FW interfaces. I suppose that you can use this concept as well.
For this you can use any SNMP enabled monitoring tool. Simply allow
SNMP-read in your security policy to your VSX and enable it on the
device itself.
them and pushing the policy again.
Not sure this is really helpful, but in theory, with the file being
there this should be working for you. Please let me know how you get
on.
Christopher McGill
On 3/6/07, David CALLEBAUT [AEMS Be] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Did anyone try to use
Dear listmembers,
Did anybody ever encountered this:
Gateway is a CP NG w. AI R55 with latest HFA on a Nokia IP 530 with
3.8.1-BUILD033.
A physical interface is configured to have 2 logical IP's using VLAN
tagging.
Both interfaces were re-distributed in OSPF to our backbone routers
(through
There is another *fine detail* that needs to be done:
In /etc on SPLAT you also need to create a file with the name scpusers that
holds a list of all SCP allowed users. Otherwise no connection is allowed.
David Callebaut
Security Engineer
Tel. +32 (0) 2 702 55 49
Mobile. +32 (0) 478 98
] FW-1 list is moving
What is the email to subscribe to it ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la
part de David CALLEBAUT [AEMS Be] Envoyé : mardi 13 mars 2007 07:00 À :
FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Objet : Re: [FW
The only thing I see is a Page cannot be displayed... And the new
checkpoint website is still -as always- vry slow when viewed from
europe
Things look bright :-S
David
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil
I would strongly suggest you all to subscribe to the Phoneboy list if
not done so yet.
Don't put your effort in convincing Checkpoint to keep the list. Don't
think for a second that Checkpoint even cares if we would like the list
to be continued otherwise they would have asked before announcing
Hi all,
Did anyone try to use internal_sendmail on a R61 (on splat)?
We used to run R55 and we configured to send out email alerts with
internal_sendmail without any problems.
Recently we upgraded to R61 and it suddenly stopped working even since.
The command is no longer known to SPLAT in R61
Dear list users,
Is there a way to capture the output of the fwm load command into a
file?
I've tried putting the standard output.txt suffix but that didn't
work.
And to my knowledge there any no arguments of the command that can be
used to redirect the output to a file.
Any suggestions would
:41
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] Fwm load output
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David CALLEBAUT [AEMS Be] wrote:
Is there a way to capture the output of the fwm load command into a
file?
I've tried putting the standard output.txt suffix but that didn't
work
2006 9:39
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] trad. VPN settings in simp. mode
David CALLEBAUT [AEMS Be] a écrit :
Dear List members,
I have a customer who wants to establish a site-to-site VPN between a
FP2 cluster and a Cisco 2621 router. I know there are some
Dear List members,
I have a customer who wants to establish a site-to-site VPN between a
FP2 cluster and a Cisco 2621 router. I know there are some pitfalls in
setting something like this up. Anybody has some good info or documents
related to setting up this kind of VPN?
Note: the customer does
As far as I can remember the R55w version did not support floodgate. Only R55
or R55p does. It had something to do with technical incompatibility with the
web services build in the w version.
I have no R55w gateways to manage but I vaguely remember posts in this mailing
list about the lack of
Cisco4ng,
If you want to block these IM's completely you'll need to use that pain
in the *ss of a SmartDefense. But to stop only the file transfers you
can simply use a rule:
Source: Internal LAN's
Dest.: Internet
Protocol groups: P2P_File_Sharing_Appications Messenger_Applications
Action:
Hi all,
Does anybody have some good information/manuals on setting up securemote on
a checkpoint FW-1 NG FP2? I have a client with a old FP2 setup (on Nokia
ipso 3.5). The client does not want to upgrade since the licenses are no
longer under support and they are not eager to pay.
I have the
Cisco4ng,
Are there other devices on this sync LAN? Perhaps even other FW's?
We didn't have the same issue, but something a bit similar where there were
2 FW clusters sharing the same Sync LAN. We were able to solve it by
modzap'ing the magic numbers of the sync multicast traffic and assigned a
Hi all,
Does someone know what RPC or DCE-RCP (or yet another) service I need to
allow for a MS machine in a DMZ to logon to the Active Directory through a
FW-1 R55HFA07 on IPSO3.8?
I've already opened LDAP, kerberos, DNS. But I know that there is also an
RPC connection.
However I am unable
HI Janis/Cisc4ng,
To be precise you can force Nokia NOT to be DR or BDR by setting the
election priority to 0 in the OSPF configuration page of voyager.
0 means: never be elected in this case.
David Callebaut
-Original Message-
From: Mailing list for discussion of Firewall-1
of Firewall-1
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
CALLEBAUT [AEMS Be]
Sent: vrijdag 10 februari 2006 7:48
To: FW-1-MAILINGLIST@AMADEUS.US.CHECKPOINT.COM
Subject: Re: [FW-1] Need help with configuring OSPF on the Nokia to work w
ith Cisco device
HI Janis/Cisc4ng,
To be precise you can force
Hi All,
Does anybody has experience in implementing a SCV setup through the use of
the local.scv file?
I'm trying to setup SCV but for some reason I get no result:
I created (actually adapted) local.scv and put in on the management server
in the $FWDIR/conf directory.
I turn on the Apply rule
David/Tom,
I the past I have had the same issues. I did get rid of them by doing a
upgrade_export and upgrade_import on the Smartcenter. After the import I was
able to delete the users I wanted to get rid off.
However: since today I have a similar issue, not with a user but a group
(which is
23 matches
Mail list logo
