offset* are the names used for overloading OO syntax. So $obj-prop,
$obj-prop = 5 and isset($obj-prop) should all work nicely.
Don't you prefer that syntax?
Oh, well that makes more sense. Call my predilection to set and get
poisoning from Java. ;-)
Looks like these pages should be updated
Was it an oversight that Zend_Registry lost its set() and has() methods
when it was refactored to extend ArrayObject, despite still having a
corresponding get() method? I don't know about everyone else, but I
prefer to pass around a registry object explicitly rather than rely on the
static
-general@lists.zend.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [fw-general] Zend_Registry needs its set() and
has() methods back
Gavin,
Thanks for the updated documentation. I gotta say, though,
that offsetSet(), offsetGet(), and offsetExists() aren't
nearly as intuitive and easy to remember
