Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread Ton Hospel
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Ronald J Kimball wrote: >> $& is readonly; how about $&&&s&s&&&; > > Oh, All right! > > -p !($|-- > &y&a > &&&y&e > &&&y&i > &&&y&o > &&&y&u > &&&y&y > &&&y&&&c)&&y&&&cd&&$&&&s&s&$&&&s&s&$&&&s&&& > &&s&s&

Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread Andrew . Savige
Ronald J Kimball wrote: > $& is readonly; how about $&&&s&s&&&; Oh, All right! -p !($|-- &y&a &&&y&e &&&y&i &&&y&o &&&y&u &&&y&y &&&y&&&c)&&y&&&cd&&$&&&s&s&$&&&s&s&$&&&s&&& &&s&s&$&&&s&s&$&&&s&s&s&s&s&&& &&s&s&$&&&s&s&$&&&s&

Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread Andrew . Savige
To quote myself: > To these, I would like to add "Ampersands of Time": > > -p !($|--&~y&a&&&~y&e&&&~y&i&&&~y&o&&&~y&u&&&~y&y&&&y&&&c)&&y&&&cd Of course, this is better written as: -p !($|-- &y&a &&&y&e &&&y&i &&&y&o &&&y&u &&&y&y &&&y&&&c)&&y&&&cd so that it resembles "Journey Beyond the Stars

Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread Jonathan E. Paton
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 06:28:08PM +1100, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > We already have "Tall Trees"/"Toothpicks": > > > > -p $_ > x=$|--&y|||c&~(y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||) 57 > klem > > -nl > ($.|y|||c|y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||)&1||print >

Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread Ronald J Kimball
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:28:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > One can get as close to 0.833 as one wants, by writing something like: > > $&&=s&s&&&; > > and adding as many 's&'s after the = as needed to obtain the desired > ratio. $& is readonly; how about $&&&s&s&&&; Ro

Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread Jeff 'japhy' Pinyan
On Jan 31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >> I wonder what the highest possible ratio is? The best I have come >> up with so far is 0.5238 (33/63) by modifying Matthew's 60-stroke >> solution: > >One can get as close to 0.833 as one wants, by writing something like: > >$&&=s&s&&&; > >and adding

Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread abigail
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 06:28:08PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > We already have "Tall Trees"/"Toothpicks": > > -p $_ x=$|--&y|||c&~(y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||) 57 klem > -nl ($.|y|||c|y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||)&1||print 59 bart > -n 1&($.|~y|||c|y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y

Re: More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-31 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 06:28:08PM +1100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I wonder what the highest possible ratio is? The best I have come > up with so far is 0.5238 (33/63) by modifying Matthew's 60-stroke > solution: > -p !(1&($.|~y|||c|y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||))||y|||cd Oh, that's neat,

More Wacky Solutions

2002-01-30 Thread Andrew . Savige
We already have "Tall Trees"/"Toothpicks": -p $_ x=$|--&y|||c&~(y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||) 57 klem -nl ($.|y|||c|y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||)&1||print 59 bart -n 1&($.|~y|||c|y|a|||y|e|||y|i|||y|o|||y|u|||y|y||)||print 59 byng -ln 1&($.|y|o|||y|e|||y|u|||y|a|||y|i|||y|y|||y|||