On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:39:49AM +0100, Jos? Castro wrote:
> * Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > So... did I miss anything?
>
> Should //= be in there? Because my perl 5.8.6 doesn't seem to have it...
It's in 5.9.x, or you can add it to 5.8.6 with this patch:
http://perl.com/CPAN
* Michael G Schwern ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> So... did I miss anything?
Should //= be in there? Because my perl 5.8.6 doesn't seem to have it...
--
Jose Alves de Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://jose-castro.org/
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 04:38:08PM -0700, Stephen McCamant wrote:
> "and" and "or" are the only ones that jump out at me.
Thanks, a simple oversight.
> I've correlated your list with the levels used in B::Deparse (based on
> perlop) here:
>
> http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~smcc/p5p-tmp/perl5ops-
> "MGS" == Michael G Schwern writes:
MGS> You've seen Mark Lentczner's Periodic Table of Perl 6 Operators
MGS> http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
MGS> What about one for Perl 5?
MGS> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/tmp/perl5ops
MGS> So... did I miss anything?
"and" a
He! Nice colection. Now, anybody up to DRAW the table? :)
Michael G Schwern wrote:
You've seen Mark Lentczner's Periodic Table of Perl 6 Operators
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
What about one for Perl 5?
Using perlop, opcode.pl and Mark's table I've done step one: draw
You've seen Mark Lentczner's Periodic Table of Perl 6 Operators
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
What about one for Perl 5?
Using perlop, opcode.pl and Mark's table I've done step one: drawn up a
complete list of Perl 5 operators. All 129 of them [1] in no particular
o
