On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ton schreef op 06 maart 2002:
> > The current use of fractionals is just fine: the bigger
> > the number, the worse your score.
>
> 54.25 Stephen Turner
>
> Is this a misprint? Are you really saying that Stephen solved
> this problem with only 25%
Ton schreef op 06 maart 2002:
> The current use of fractionals is just fine: the bigger
> the number, the worse your score.
54.25 Stephen Turner
Is this a misprint? Are you really saying that Stephen solved
this problem with only 25% of his characters being \w\s ??
That is genius!
That is the
In article ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> It looks to me as thoughthe tiebreaker scores are in the wrong order.
>>
>> To quote the rules:
>> "This month's tie
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> It looks to me as thoughthe tiebreaker scores are in the wrong order.
>
> To quote the rules:
> "This month's tiebreaker will favor the script with the greater number of
> [^\w\s] characters.&q
It looks to me as thoughthe tiebreaker scores are in the wrong order.
To quote the rules:
"This month's tiebreaker will favor the script with the greater number of
[^\w\s] characters."
Looking at the Leaderboard:
2 52.5 Mtv Europe
3 52.53 Rick Klement
4 52.55 Ton Hospel
