On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, Stephen is my dark horse tip to win the tournament. Why?
This is Turner's 3rd Golf Tournament, and he's only lost twice.
Tee hee.
Still, this morning's leaderboard makes me feel a bit out of my depth. I was
only 2 strokes behind
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:06:14PM -0500, Selector, Lev Y ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hello,
I searched for OLAP on perl.com and CPAN (and perl olap on Google) - got
no entries.
Also there is nothing on data warehousing in the perl world.
Am I missing something?
I thought Perl is
Le Mercredi 6 Mars 2002 15:55, Chris Dolan a écrit :
[...]
However, I should say that the more I read the fwp archives, the more
intimidated I get! I didn't realize how much I had handicapped myself
by not upgrading perl5.6.0-5.6.1!!! :-)
Chris
I realize how much I had handicapped myself
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:06:14PM -0500, Selector, Lev Y wrote:
Hello,
I searched for OLAP on perl.com and CPAN (and perl olap on Google) - got
no entries.
Also there is nothing on data warehousing in the perl world.
Am I missing something?
No, but I think we are. What's OLAP?
I
Rich == Rich Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rich This seems pretty ugly to me (Randal didn't like it much either :-)
Yup.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
[EMAIL PROTECTED] URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Perl/Unix/security consulting,
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:45:18AM -0800, Rich Morin wrote:
He
suggested, when asked, that folks could put in newlines as follows:
'yada yada yada \qq{\n}'
I meant to add this in last time: There is also the option of having an
additional function that adds the newline in, e.g.
BC == Bernie Cosell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cced perl6-language
BC I wonder if the solution is to look at it the other way: that you
BC have to do something to get interpolation to happen. If we look
BC at it from the old adage of making the more common things simpler,
BC at least
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 17:57:07 -0500, Uri Guttman wrote:
how often will you need to interpolate a hash?
A whole hash: quite rarely. A hash item: a LOT. Don't forget that
$foo{BAR} will now become %foo{BAR}
--
Bart.
Uri Guttman:
# printf %d hash is $(%foo.string), $bar ;
#
# no ambiguity and no confusion. how often will you need to
# interpolate a
# hash?
As others have pointed out, %foo{BAR} has to work. But I have another
question for you: what's wrong with
sprintf '%d hash is %s', $bar,
In article p05100339b8abfb25cfdf@[192.168.254.205],
Rich Morin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that I'm suggesting a new function
name because printf has a little-used capability that could conflict with
my proposed syntax:
The format string is reused as often as necessary
to satisfy the
BD == Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BD Uri Guttman:
BD # printf %d hash is $(%foo.string), $bar ;
BD #
BD # no ambiguity and no confusion. how often will you need to
BD # interpolate a
BD # hash?
BD As others have pointed out, %foo{BAR} has to work. But I have
At 5:27 PM -0800 3/6/02, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
The format string is reused as often as necessary
to satisfy the arguments.
Where did you get that? Not true for Perl or C.
Apparently, when I did a man printf, I got the one in FreeBSD's Section 1:
PRINTF(1)
At 11:24 PM -0500 3/6/02, Uri Guttman wrote:
qn would be just like qq but not allow any
direct hash interpolations (%foo or %foo{bar}). you can always get those
with $() if needed. this solves the common case with a minimal of noise
and the uncommon case has a simple out of using $(). no
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:24:57PM -0500, Uri Guttman wrote:
that is another point. not allowing a complete hash to interpolate. but
what defines that? what if you wanted %s{bar} and that was a format and
not a hash and in a double quoted string? my proposal handles that well
with no major
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 08:56:18PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Apparently, when I did a man printf, I got the one in FreeBSD's Section 1:
The format string is reused as often as necessary to satisfy the
arguments. Any extra format specifications are evaluated with zero
Paul Makepeace [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 09:45:18AM -0800, Rich Morin wrote:
He
suggested, when asked, that folks could put in newlines as follows:
'yada yada yada \qq{\n}'
I meant to add this in last time: There is also the option of having an
additional
16 matches
Mail list logo
