On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Philip Newton wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:34:30 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith C. Ivey)
wrote:
But s'\x0\xff' @' to make it shorter and more visible on my system.
y(s))y) ?
qBut y'\x0\xff' @' to make it yhorter and more viyible on my yyytem. ?
Besides, aren't
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 03:41:40AM +0200, Ilmari Karonen wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Philip Newton wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:34:30 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith C. Ivey)
wrote:
But s'\x0\xff' @' to make it shorter and more visible on my system.
y(s))y) ?
qBut y'\x0\xff'
Ilmari Karonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Besides, aren't single quotes special for s/// and y/// anyway?
I think what Keith _really_ meant was tr[\0\xff][ @] or
equivalent.
No, I was intending for the operation to be performed on the
program Patrick had suggested (or my revision), not on
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 20:34:30 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Keith C. Ivey)
wrote:
But s'\x0\xff' @' to make it shorter and more visible on my system.
y(s))y) ?
Cheers,
Philip
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:22:57PM -0500, Patrick Gaskill wrote:
:
:There's an article about CETI's next message into space
:
: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/08/231247mode=nested
[ snip ]
:
:My attempt, at 79 characters:
There's an article about CETI's next message into space
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/01/08/231247mode=nested
and CETI is providing the message in ASCII 1's and 0's (with example noise
added) to be decoded for our own amusement. Of course, I wrote a Perl script
to do this for me. Of
Patrick Gaskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My attempt, at 79 characters:
$\=$/;undef$/;$_=;s/.{70}//s;tr,01\n,\x00\xff,d;
print$1while/(.{1,127})\n?/g;
Are we doing this without command-line switches? This should
do the same in 65 characters:
