Re: NPL Puzzler for 6 Oct

2002-10-14 Thread Abigail
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:54:20PM -0400, Bernie Cosell wrote: The NPL puzzle for 6 oct was an interesting little Perl exercise [I'm not sure how to solve it analytically --- I played with it some to little avail --- but it was certainly subject to brute force, and it turned out to be a

Re: NPL Puzzler for 6 Oct

2002-10-14 Thread Mtv Europe
Hello Abigail! [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Abigail) wrote in: On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:54:20PM -0400, Bernie Cosell wrote: Write out the digits from 1-9 in order. Then add some plus (+) signs and times (x) signs to the string to make it add up to 2,002. As usual in arithmetic,

NPL Puzzler for 6 Oct

2002-10-11 Thread Bernie Cosell
The NPL puzzle for 6 oct was an interesting little Perl exercise [I'm not sure how to solve it analytically --- I played with it some to little avail --- but it was certainly subject to brute force, and it turned out to be a cute little thing. Write out the digits from 1-9 in order. Then

Re: NPL Puzzler for 6 Oct

2002-10-11 Thread Ronald J Kimball
On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:54:20PM -0400, Bernie Cosell wrote: The NPL puzzle for 6 oct was an interesting little Perl exercise [I'm not sure how to solve it analytically --- I played with it some to little avail --- but it was certainly subject to brute force, and it turned out to be a

Re: NPL Puzzler for 6 Oct

2002-10-11 Thread Bernie Cosell
What's odd is that my little Perl program found *TWO* solutions, but one is potentially ambiguous [in particular, given those rules, what should the value of a*b*c be?-- it doesn't say whether things should be done left-to-right or right-to-left, so perhaps that could be used to