Re: "Secret" operators

2005-02-03 Thread Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat
Le mercredi 02 février 2005 à 21:36, Sébastien Aperghis-Tramoni écrivait: > Philippe 'BooK' Bruhat wrote: > > >So we have : > > > >symbolnicknameRole > >-- > ><=> spaceship documented operator > > > >0+

Re: "Secret" operators

2005-02-03 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Eugene" == Eugene van der Pijll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> @{[]} aka ???The Schwartz early 1990s Eugene> The Larry, May 1 1994 Eugene> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.lang.perl/msg/1d82c7c3f3e94266 The array version was actually discussed in pr

Re: "Secret" operators

2005-02-03 Thread Peter Haworth
On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 16:20:05 +0200, Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:33:35 +1100 (EST) > > IIRC, Ton's ~- invention allows you to eliminate the parens in: > > > > $y = ($x-1)*4; > > > > by using instead: > > > > $y = ~-$x*4; > > > > saving a whopping two strokes. T

Re: "Secret" operators

2005-02-03 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 09:02:56PM -, McGlinchy, Alistair wrote: > Unfortunately -+- is bugged [*], but I'll leave these as gotcha's for > your production code. :-) > > [*] You might want to consider: print-+- '-2B' x 5; # Bug? No. perlop say: if the string starts with a plus or mi

Re: "Secret" operators

2005-02-03 Thread Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 04:20:05PM +0200, Vladi Belperchinov-Shabanski wrote: > On Wed, 2 Feb 2005 12:33:35 +1100 (EST) > Andrew Savige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jos_ Castro wrote: > > > Apart from the "secret eskimo greeting" and the "goatse operator", > > > can anyone tell me about other