Andrew Savige [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
After eating sushi with chopsticks, then cleaning my teeth with
toothpicks, I thought of this for some reason:
y|||c6||y|||c14||!y|a-z!y|A-Z!y|0-9y|-_a-zA-Z0-9||c||
printok;
FunChow||ChowFun;
--
Michael R. Wolf
All mammals
It also cradles something ugly/cute (err, I mean fragile).
Think of it as a bird's eye view
Paren's head- @{[]} - Rubber baby buggy bumper
^- Baby
%26start%3D160%26ndsp%3D20%26svnum%3D10%26h
l%3Den%26lr%3D%26sa%3DN
Or the at-square-paren-paren-square operator! :-) Na!
--
Michael R. Wolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE** new, shorter spelling of obsolescent MichaelRunningWolf-at-att.net
-Original Message-
From: Jerrad
What's the difference between @{[]} and () ? Other than obfuscatory
purposes?
The former interpolates the list into qq{} (i.e. double quotes), the later
doesn't.
--
Michael R. Wolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**NOTE** new, shorter spelling of obsolescent MichaelRunningWolf-at-att.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is really a form of parenthesis.
So call it the fat brackets.
Or, to add a bit of consonance:
at-fat-brack
or, even
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@ckets
or, shortened to
@-brackets
But that could get confused with the more common (and more useful)
@{...}
--
Michael R
i haven't run it but i already see conflicts with nested $_.
It's not obvious that the $_ nesting is a problem. The point should be moot
because the Cwhile loop *should* localize $_. It doesn't. Well, it does,
but there's a loophole.
Quoting pg 18 of the 3rd Edition Camel (emphasis added):
Keep the old name if you wish, but add one that's more psychologically healthy,
too!!! (P.S. Thanks for the warning. That's just plain *responsible*
behavior to the community!!! One image could ruin someone's whole view of
Perl.)
Michael
--
Michael R. Wolf
All mammals learn by playing
