- Original Message -
From: Stephen Goranson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: g-megillot@McMaster.ca
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 8:13 PM
Subject: [Megillot] Qumran history (brief replies To R. Gmirkin)
[...]
P.S. Y. Hirschfeld p. 161 n. 222 claims J. Zangenberg (2000)
systematically
Dierk, the word in the text I cited, the new book by Y.H., page 161, note 222,
is indeed refuted.
S. Goranson
Quoting Dierk van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Even more worse, for Zangenberg was indeed meant.
Hirschfeld_ QUMRAN IN THE SECOND TEMPLE PERIOD, Reassessing the
Archaeological
10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Megillot] Qumran history (brief replies To R. Gmirkin)
Dierk, the word in the text I cited, the new book by Y.H., page 161, note
222,
is indeed refuted.
S. Goranson
Quoting Dierk van den Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Even more worse, for Zangenberg was indeed meant
