Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
printer’s processor and put it on the Mac’s CPU.
It would be interesting to try, but I’m not sure if it would make a
difference to the bottom line.
--
You
Il giorno 28-05-2011 13:41, Geke ha scritto:
Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
printer¹s processor and put it on the Mac¹s CPU.
It would be interesting to try, but I¹m not sure if it
On May 28, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Geke wrote:
Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
printer’s processor and put it on the Mac’s CPU.
Decompressing the tiff file (which is LZW compressed) is done
Which do you all prefer?
I had to replace my wireless router at home, and I soon realized I was back to
using Cox's craptacular servers again.
I had OpenDNS set before, but didn't know about Googles then.
--
Bruce Johnson
Wherever you go, there you are B. Banzai, PhD
--
You received this
I use googles public dns. Its much much better. I have cox as well and their
dns servers are crap
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at
At 1:56 PM -0700 5/28/2011, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Which do you all prefer?
I had to replace my wireless router at home, and I soon realized I
was back to using Cox's craptacular servers again.
I had OpenDNS set before, but didn't know about Googles then.
I prefer my defaults from
- Original Message
From: Valter Prahlad valter.prah...@fastwebnet.it
Most multi-page documents (.pdf's or even M$ Word docs) print at the
usuall
30
to 80 page/minute even if they large color files. I wonder why these small
B/W
.tif scans take so long?
It might be
- Original Message
From: Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
On May 28, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Geke wrote:
Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
printer’s processor and
Il giorno 28-05-2011 23:19, glen ha scritto:
So I ran some tests for the Geke minded.
[...]
Certainly many different file sizes. And I don't have a clue why.
I'll make some guess... and some explanation.
(I could be wrong, though)
BTW, it's all about the format (and options) used when
That's why I use Google's. They use prefetching and it's pretty accurate and
generally faster. I don't have any experience with Verizons however, but I
do with google, cox, yahoo, Timewarner and maybe 2 others.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those
I would caution against using Level 3's DNS as there is a lot of talk about
Level 3 restricting their DNS Servers so only people with Level 3 IP Addresses
can use them.
From: Dan dantear...@gmail.com
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com; macin...@googlegroups.com
[html formatting removed, and whole text trimmed]
At 4:18 PM -0700 5/28/2011, Albert Carter wrote:
I would caution against using Level 3's DNS as there is a lot of
talk about Level 3 restricting their DNS Servers so only people with
Level 3 IP Addresses can use them.
cite?
The only
12 matches
Mail list logo
