On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Jasiu wrote:
I have an old satellite dish hanging on the outside of the wall of the
cabin. Will that pick up the signal? I could put an amplifier like
you used to get at radio shack there
Here are some links on doing that:
Bill Connelly wrote:
On Sep 12, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
snip-
No special concerns for lightening? underground currents? hooked to
such a sensitive area of the computer?
Seems like you're asking for it ... I would try the wireless first.
Here in
Howdy,
It varies quite a bit. Trees and other obstacle cut down the distance
and the type of antannae you use can affect it greatly. Unless this is
out west, in an arid, flat area, it is unlikely it will work without a
little extra work. The good news is that it is not that hard. You need
a signal!!! CoolKat
-Original Message-
From: Jasiu johnschiavone...@gmail.com
Sent: Sep 11, 2009 6:32 PM
To: G-Group g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Wireless 350 MHZ Yikes!
How far can I expect wireless coverage without the use of a repeater?
My father has a cabin approximately 80
I wouldn't be worried about lightning or underground currents, as Cat5
is decently insulated, but wireless would be much easier, and I
guarantee that N would reach, provided it doesn't have to go through too
many walls to get there.
Bill Connelly wrote:
No special concerns for lightening?
At 14:32 -0400 9/12/09, Chance Reecher wrote:
I wouldn't be worried about lightning or underground currents, as Cat5
is decently insulated, but wireless would be much easier, and I
guarantee that N would reach, provided it doesn't have to go through too
many walls to get there.
Ten base T
On Sep 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Bill Connelly wrote:
That was my first thought, too.
No special concerns for lightening? underground currents? hooked to
such a sensitive area of the computer?
Buried cables are virtually immune to lightning, particularly if
buried in plastic pipe.
--
How far can I expect wireless coverage without the use of a repeater?
My father has a cabin approximately 80 yards from his house. He would
like to have internet reception there as well. Anyone know what range
I can expect from an 802.11n card? Which one will work in
aforementioned machine?
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:32 PM, Jasiu johnschiavone...@gmail.com wrote:
How far can I expect wireless coverage without the use of a repeater?
My father has a cabin approximately 80 yards from his house. He would
like to have internet reception there as well. Anyone know what range
I can
On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:59 PM, iJohn wrote:
How about any sources of potential interference? Most cordless phones,
except for the newer DECT 6.0 models, will blow your typical 2.4GHz
wireless connection away.
Actually, only 2.4ghz phones will do this. 900Mhz, 5Ghz and the DECT 6
phones will
Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Sep 11, 2009, at 3:59 PM, iJohn wrote:
How about any sources of potential interference? Most cordless phones,
except for the newer DECT 6.0 models, will blow your typical 2.4GHz
wireless connection away.
Actually, only 2.4ghz phones will do this. 900Mhz, 5Ghz
Sent: Sep 11, 2009 6:32 PM
To: G-Group g3-5-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Wireless 350 MHZ Yikes!
How far can I expect wireless coverage without the use of a repeater?
My father has a cabin approximately 80 yards from his house. He would
like to have internet reception there as well. Anyone know
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Clark Martin cm...@sonic.net wrote:
And they won't blow away your WiFi, necessarily. A 2.4 GHz phone will
interfere with your WiFi if it's on the same frequencies. How much is
problematic. The biggest problem is that the phone will change
frequencies as
13 matches
Mail list logo
