Re: Help with Mac OS9 Drivers, running in OS-X/Classic

2011-05-13 Thread jsmanson
Thanks Bruce - it is working just fine on OS9, I was just seeing if there was a 'fix' to pop this thing into a window in OS-X, and it doesn't look like it is possible. National Instruments does provide a developers toolkit, so one could I guess in theory write one, but it's probably not worth the

Re: I am forced to go Intel? Common rant, I guess.

2011-05-13 Thread Jonas Lopez
What is going on here is the long known fact that Microsoft is a SOFTWARE company not a hardware company and Apple is BOTH SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE company. You sure can be sure that Apple has NO INTENTION of letting ANY of its software run on all this hardware that IS NOT APPLE and that Apple did

Re: I am forced to go Intel? Common rant, I guess.

2011-05-13 Thread Kris Tilford
On May 13, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote: If you believe that EFI is some great conspiracy to prevent you from running another OS on a Mac it is YOU who doesn't understand what EFI is. I believe he's referring to TPM, not EFI. My understanding of TPM is that it's a set of

Re: I am forced to go Intel? Common rant, I guess.

2011-05-13 Thread Ralph Green
Bruce, EFI is fine. BIOS had major problems, since it runs in real mode. It is TPM that is the problem. Apple certainly used TPM on their early x86 hardware. If they have removed it, that is a good thing. I will have to search for some real evidence on that matter. Ralph On Fri, 2011-05-13

Re: I am forced to go Intel? Common rant, I guess.

2011-05-13 Thread Jonas Lopez
Sorry Alex, I was refering to the fact that MS has some 90+% of the business and military market based upon the programs running that are owned as the creator by MS. So as to have been a fly on the wall in Apples core meetings, it was clear that the way to increase market is to change chip