On Oct 8, 8:20 pm, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 6:43 PM -0700 10/8/2009, Steven F. Scharff wrote:
I am running a Mac Power/PC G4 presently running OS 10.3.9.
Exactly which Power Mac G4?
Perhaps I should have been more specific.
System Profile is thus:
Machine Model:Power
On Oct 8, 7:43 pm, Steven F. Scharff microfreedom.in...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am running a Mac Power/PC G4 presently running OS 10.3.9. I am
planning on buying a Mac Mini, but read that there are upgrades
available for my model unit.
I'll be brief. Is it worth my while to buy and install a
At 10:38 PM -0700 10/8/2009, Steven F. Scharff wrote:
On Oct 8, 8:20 pm, Dan dantear...@gmail.com wrote:
At 6:43 PM -0700 10/8/2009, Steven F. Scharff wrote:
I am running a Mac Power/PC G4 presently running OS 10.3.9.
Machine Model: Power Mac G4
CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (3.3)
On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
Is there a way to individually edit the autofill in Entourage 2004
or 2008?
I know you can clear it. But I just need a couple of names gone.
Doesn't Entourage maintain it's own address books and received
addresses files? Here's a vaguely
On Oct 8, 2009, at 10:38 PM, Steven F. Scharff wrote:
Perhaps I should have been more specific.
System Profile is thus:
Machine Model: Power Mac G4
CPU Type:PowerPC G4 (3.3)
Number Of CPUs: 1
CPU Speed: 1.25 GHz
L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB
L3 Cache (per CPU): 1
On 10/9/09 9:02 AM, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu Broadcast
into the ether:
On Oct 8, 2009, at 9:20 PM, Kyle Hansen wrote:
Is there a way to individually edit the autofill in Entourage 2004
or 2008?
I know you can clear it. But I just need a couple of names gone.
Hi!
I would be interested in how you guys see this.
When I see the CPU speeds of recent POWER chips (not PowerPC, but the G5
derived from the POWER4+) it is very hard for me to believe, that the PowerPC
developement wasn't able to compete with Intels /all-so-fast/ x86 chips.
On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Mac User #330250 wrote:
Hi!
I would be interested in how you guys see this.
Still doesn't change the fundamental issues: IBM does not desire
Apple's business sufficiently to provide chips Apple needs; they
cannot or will not produce a version suitable for
http://www.blueskyheart.com/bsi.html
Blueskyheart has mostly really cool desktops, but they also have a set
of icons that are neat.
Good Luck!!
On Oct 7, 6:29 am, roger deghetto stink...@ptd.net wrote:
im looking for sites that have high quality os x icons for the dock
etc i know of
At 9:20 PM +0200 10/9/2009, Mac User #330250 wrote:
When I see the CPU speeds of recent POWER chips (not PowerPC, but the G5
derived from the POWER4+) it is very hard for me to believe, that the PowerPC
developement wasn't able to compete with Intels /all-so-fast/ x86 chips.
The switch was more
On Oct 9, 3:20 pm, Mac User #330250 macuser330...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi!
I would be interested in how you guys see this.
When I see the CPU speeds of recent POWER chips (not PowerPC, but the G5
derived from the POWER4+) it is very hard for me to believe, that the PowerPC
developement wasn't
Sort of on the same issue, does anyone know if there's something
different about CNN videos?
I do fine with YouTube and most other video formats (and I use
ClickToFlash to avoid loading Flash stuff I don't want), but CNN
videos play terribly for me. (AGP G4 1.4ghz, 2 gigs, RAM 10.4.11
On Oct 9, 2009, at 2:46 PM, Dan wrote:
At 9:20 PM +0200 10/9/2009, Mac User #330250 wrote:
When I see the CPU speeds of recent POWER chips (not PowerPC, but
the G5
derived from the POWER4+) it is very hard for me to believe, that
the PowerPC
developement wasn't able to compete with
On 7 Oct 2009, at 18:49:15 PDT, dc wrote:
On Oct 7, 7:29 am, roger deghetto stink...@ptd.net wrote:
im looking for sites that have high quality os x icons for the dock
etc i know of deviantart and interfacelift anyone else have any
others
Here are a few other sites with free downloads,
What should be more pertinent is what applications you intend or are running on
your existing G4.
If you are using just basic office apps , browsing email, burning a few mp3s
onto CDs and browsing family photos then your current machine will do that
easily ( although a bit more memory as Dan
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Bruce Johnson
john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu wrote:
Still doesn't change the fundamental issues: IBM does not desire
Apple's business sufficiently to provide chips Apple needs; they
cannot or will not produce a version suitable for laptop use.
There's that ...
I know I mentioned this before about the Intel Chips is because when Apple
created the G5 it ran way too hot to run in laptop so he (Steve Jobs) went to
Intel for help and they made the Core Dual... And when he contracted them they
had to agree not to make PC's with the ability to run OS
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Richard Gerome
onecoolka...@earthlink.net wrote:
And when he contracted them they had to agree not to make PC's
with the ability to run OS 10 Tiger and Lep only Apple...
Not sure I understand what you're saying here. I've heard that there
are folks who *do* run
On Oct 9, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Richard Gerome wrote:
I know I mentioned this before about the Intel Chips is because
when Apple created the G5 it ran way too hot to run in laptop so he
(Steve Jobs) went to Intel for help and they made the Core Dual...
And when he contracted them they
On 8 Oct 2009, at 22:00, Clark Martin wrote:
I just tried it (under 10.5.6). Finder Find works okay but it doesn't
find Hidden files.
When you say you get nothing, what does that mean? Pressing Command-F
doesn't bring up the Find Window or you it doesn't find files?
You could always
At 5:09 PM -0700 10/9/2009, Bruce Johnson wrote:
On Oct 9, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Richard Gerome wrote:
I know I mentioned this before about the Intel Chips is because
when Apple created the G5 it ran way too hot to run in laptop so he
(Steve Jobs) went to Intel for help and they made the
Someone told me this I never read it anywhere and I wasn't sure if it was
true either??? I guy I know told me he read this in one of those computer
mags... I just hope I can still use my G4 for a long time before I have to
resort to an Intel Mac... Maybe it was Intel for the G5 then???
At 12:52 AM -0400 10/10/2009, Dan wrote:
At 11:19 PM -0400 10/9/2009, Richard Gerome wrote:
Isn't it true that the G5 was way too hot for the laptop???
The PowerPC 970 (what Apple called the G5) was physically too big,
too hot, and sucked too much power.
After I replied, I remembered seeing a
23 matches
Mail list logo
