[html formatting removed, and whole text trimmed]
At 4:18 PM -0700 5/28/2011, Albert Carter wrote:
I would caution against using Level 3's DNS as there is a lot of
talk about Level 3 restricting their DNS Servers so only people with
Level 3 IP Addresses can use them.
cite?
The only reference
I would caution against using Level 3's DNS as there is a lot of talk about
Level 3 restricting their DNS Servers so only people with Level 3 IP Addresses
can use them.
From: Dan
To: g3-5-list@googlegroups.com; macin...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 28,
That's why I use Google's. They use prefetching and it's pretty accurate and
generally faster. I don't have any experience with Verizons however, but I
do with google, cox, yahoo, Timewarner and maybe 2 others.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those u
Il giorno 28-05-2011 23:19, glen ha scritto:
> So I ran some tests for the Geke minded.
> [...]
> Certainly many different file sizes. And I don't have a clue why.
I'll make some guess... and some explanation.
(I could be wrong, though)
BTW, it's all about the format (and options) used when savi
- Original Message
> From: Bruce Johnson
> On May 28, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Geke wrote:
>
> > Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
> > uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
> > printer’s processor and put it on the Mac’s
- Original Message
> From: Valter Prahlad
> > Most multi-page documents (.pdf's or even M$ Word docs) print at the
> > usuall
>30
> > to 80 page/minute even if they large color files. I wonder why these small
>B/W
> > .tif scans take so long?
>
> It might be because they are p
At 1:56 PM -0700 5/28/2011, Bruce Johnson wrote:
Which do you all prefer?
I had to replace my wireless router at home, and I soon realized I
was back to using Cox's craptacular servers again.
I had OpenDNS set before, but didn't know about Googles then.
I prefer my defaults from Verizon
I use googles public dns. Its much much better. I have cox as well and their
dns servers are crap
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com
Which do you all prefer?
I had to replace my wireless router at home, and I soon realized I was back to
using Cox's craptacular servers again.
I had OpenDNS set before, but didn't know about Googles then.
--
Bruce Johnson
"Wherever you go, there you are" B. Banzai, PhD
--
You received thi
On May 28, 2011, at 4:41 AM, Geke wrote:
Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
printer’s processor and put it on the Mac’s CPU.
Decompressing the tiff file (which is LZW compressed) is done b
Il giorno 28-05-2011 13:41, Geke ha scritto:
> Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
> uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
> printer¹s processor and put it on the Mac¹s CPU.
>
> It would be interesting to try, but I¹m not sure if it
Or: Glen could batch-process the images, i.e. open them and save them
uncompressed, and then print those. That would take the load off the
printer’s processor and put it on the Mac’s CPU.
It would be interesting to try, but I’m not sure if it would make a
difference to the bottom line.
--
You re
12 matches
Mail list logo