On Jan 20, 8:51 am, John Carmonne carmo...@aol.com wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
That's nothing. I have MS Word docs from 20 years ago that MS Word 2011
does not open.
File formats change ... just be glad you're not NASA and have to decipher
45 year old
On Jan 19, 11:29 pm, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
On Jan 19, 2011, at 2:12 PM, rogerd095 wrote:
On Jan 18, 1:56 pm, Lawrence David Eden lde...@comcast.net wrote:
I run AppleWorks 6 on my G4. You don't need OS9.
Conversely, AppleWorks runs perfectly well on OS 9. You
Realistically, yes you do. While it's not as dire as it used to be before
the advent of Classila, OS 9 is still almost useless on the modern web.
Apologies for any misunderstanding. For the sake of clarity, I should
perhaps have finished my post by adding 'to run AppleWorks.'
Which
That's nothing. I have MS Word docs from 20 years ago that MS Word 2011 does
not open.
File formats change ... just be glad you're not NASA and have to decipher 45
year old data tapes starting by reconstructing the tape mechanism BEFORE trying
to decipher the data!
--
Bruce
On Jan 20,
On Jan 20, 2011, at 6:33 AM, rogerd095 rogerd...@googlemail.com wrote:
Which platform you prefer is a matter of choice. It's just a pity that
AppleWorks 6 seems quite a bit less polished than ClarisWorks 5.0 - or
even v.4.0, for that matter.
Or the late lamented still-missed Claris
On Jan 20, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
File formats change ... just be glad you're not NASA and have to decipher 45
year old data tapes starting by reconstructing the tape mechanism BEFORE
trying to decipher the data!
Thats why NASA was shut down :)
--
You received this
On Jan 20, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
That's nothing. I have MS Word docs from 20 years ago that MS Word 2011 does
not open.
File formats change ... just be glad you're not NASA and have to decipher 45
year old data tapes starting by reconstructing the tape mechanism BEFORE
On Jan 20, 10:01 am, Bruce Johnson john...@pharmacy.arizona.edu
wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 7:51 AM, John Carmonne wrote:
Hmm, sounds like Binary, been there;-)
Binary data, with fun things like different endedness and things like 14 bit
bytes, etc.
However this old data is proving
On Jan 17, 2011, at 5:44 PM, Wm. Arnold wrote:
Hi Group,
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
I do not want to put OS9 on them.
Wm
AppleWorks 6 runs on OS 9 all the way through !0.6.6.
John Carmonne
Yorba Linda CA
92886 USA
Sent from
On Jan 18, 1:56 pm, Lawrence David Eden lde...@comcast.net wrote:
I run AppleWorks 6 on my G4. You don't need OS9.
Conversely, AppleWorks runs perfectly well on OS 9. You don't need OS
X!
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5
I run AppleWorks 6 on my G4. You don't need OS9.
Larry
Hi Group,
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
I do not want to put OS9 on them.
Wm
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a
group for those using G3,
IMO Appleworks is better than iWork.
On Jan 17, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Clark Martin wrote:
On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Yersinia wrote:
Appleworks rocks, YEAH!! Wow, didn't know it would work with Leopard or on
a Macintel. I've been running 6.2.9 since I was on OS 9, and kept it when I
got
Hi Group,
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
I do not want to put OS9 on them.
Wm
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power
iWork? I can run Appleworks on my MacBook Pro though. It doesn't even need
Rosetta!
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a group for
those using G3, G4, and G5 desktop Macs - with a particular focus on Power Macs.
The list FAQ is at
On 2011/01/17 18:44, Wm. Arnold so eloquently wrote:
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
AppleWorks will run just fine on your PPCs running Tiger. The
alternatives are iWork ($79), Office ($150), or NeoOffice (free).
Tina
--
iMac 20
I think there is an OS X version of OpenOffice.
On Jan 17, 2011, at 6:54 PM, Tina K. wrote:
On 2011/01/17 18:44, Wm. Arnold so eloquently wrote:
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
AppleWorks will run just fine on your PPCs running
On 1/17/11 7:44 PM, Wm. Arnold wrote:
Hi Group,
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
I do not want to put OS9 on them.
Wm
I have a G5 2.5 dualie running 10.5.8 and I am currently using
Appleworks 6.2.4 and have been for years with no
On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Wm. Arnold wrote:
Hi Group,
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
I do not want to put OS9 on them.
Wm
Nothing replaces Appleworks :-( :-(:-( :-(!!!
--
You received this message because you are a member
On 1/17/11 9:43 PM, John Callahan of jcalla...@stny.rr.com sent
On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Wm. Arnold wrote:
Hi Group,
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
I do not want to put OS9 on them.
Wm
Nothing replaces Appleworks
On 1/17/11 10:57 PM, Dana Collins wrote:
On 1/17/11 9:43 PM, John Callahan of jcalla...@stny.rr.com sent
On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Wm. Arnold wrote:
Hi Group,
I would like to know what replaces Appleworks.
I am using G4 G5 Power PC's with OSX10.4.11
I do not want to put OS9 on them.
Wm
On Jan 17, 2011, at 9:23 PM, Yersinia wrote:
Appleworks rocks, YEAH!! Wow, didn't know it would work with Leopard or on a
Macintel. I've been running 6.2.9 since I was on OS 9, and kept it when I got
Tiger but I'm still with my PPCs (now running 10.4.11 on the Quicksilver 867
and iBook
21 matches
Mail list logo
