IOGEAR Hi-Speed USB 2.0 5-Port PCI Expansion Card (faster data transfer for
existing peripherals)
FirmTek SeriTek/1S2 Serial ATA/150 Dual Channel Mac PCI Controller (to access
her G5 iMac hard drive and a future additional drive).
Another GB of RAM
I'm answering as a G4 MDD lover.
USB
Thanks for the input!
I have two drives, an 80 GB Apple-branded which came with the MDD with 10.5,
and a 20 GB Seagate with 10.4. The Quicksilver came with no drive. Both boot
the MDD but neither will boot the Quicksilver (2002), so for now I'm leaning
toward the MDD.
In the MDD I'm trying to
I can't help with Memory, I have 4x512MB in each.
But I can tell you - the SATA drives are bootable with that card. 3TB
hanging off it. Transfers between two drives super fast.
On Jun 14, 12:29 pm, Dave Bjur d...@bjurconsulting.com wrote:
Thanks for the input!
--
You received this message
Cool! I'm ordering the card today.
-- Dave
On Jun 14, 2010, at 10:11 AM, JoeTaxpayer wrote:
But I can tell you - the SATA drives are bootable with that card. 3TB
hanging off it. Transfers between two drives super fast.
--
You received this message because you are a member of G-Group, a
Hi Dave,
I got this USB2 card from amazon, for less than $10. It works great
on my Dual G4 QS 2002- I've used external hard drives and ipods with
it, with no problems. Don't plug your keyboard or mouse into it
though, or else you'll have trouble waking it up from sleep mode.
Apparently OS X
Greetings,
I am new to the group, and would appreciate your advice and counsel.
The motherboard for my wife's 1.8 gHz 20 G5 iMac gave up last week. Since
money is tight, I'm planning to set her up with a G4 PowerMac. I recently
purchased two surplus models ($50 ea.):
Quicksilver dual
On Jun 13, 2010, at 2:15 PM, Dave Bjur wrote:
Greetings,
I am new to the group, and would appreciate your advice and counsel.
The motherboard for my wife's 1.8 gHz 20 G5 iMac gave up last week. Since
money is tight, I'm planning to set her up with a G4 PowerMac. I recently
purchased
Well the biggest difference off the top of my head will be the RAM.
The Quicksilver uses older PC 133 SDRAM and the MDD uses newer DDR
RAM which also explains the difference in price for the RAM. PC 133
is quite expensive these days. There is also the bus speed of the
mainboard too which is
I vote for the Quicksilver. It's quieter. Runs cooler. Take the ZIP
cage off (comes off easily) and there is more room for running SCSI or
SATA cables. Each can take the same graphics cards (Radeon 9000 is a
good choice) and have same # of PCI card slots.
--
You received this message
it was being shipped to my house. :)
Now, about the subject of this post: MDD or Quicksilver. I kinda
prefer the look of the Quicksilver over the MDD. I've read that the
MDD is nicknamed 'Wind Tunnel', but that there was a firmware update
that may have fixed that problem. I'm setting up a little
the subject of this post: MDD or Quicksilver. I kinda
prefer the look of the Quicksilver over the MDD. I've read that the
MDD is nicknamed 'Wind Tunnel', but that there was a firmware update
that may have fixed that problem. I'm setting up a little computer
room in the house and the last thing I
a larger wad of cash than I did. And if you were one
of those snipers, then congratulations... you got a very nice
machine. I just wish it was being shipped to my house. :)
Now, about the subject of this post: MDD or Quicksilver. I kinda
prefer the look of the Quicksilver over the MDD. I've
On Feb 20, 2009, at 12:38 AM, lrbarrios wrote:
Now, about the subject of this post: MDD or Quicksilver. I kinda
prefer the look of the Quicksilver over the MDD. I've read that the
MDD is nicknamed 'Wind Tunnel', but that there was a firmware update
that may have fixed that problem. I'm
The QS 2002 1 GHz DP is a heck of a good machine. I used one for the
last few years, doing lots of Photoshop and video editing (iMovie and
Final Cut Express), until moving up to a G5 so as to be able to run
Final Cut Studio. I still use it for many things.
The QS 2002 can do pure OS 9 if
14 matches
Mail list logo
