Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-07 Thread Tim Gochnour
On Dec 6, 2010, at 3:28 PM, ah...clem wrote: since my initial post to this thread, i have had a private exchange with list nanny Paul Stamsen. i have been accused, because of my post, of being rude and lacking common courtesy. to that i say that when individuals post a response containing

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-06 Thread ah...clem
But don't subject the rest of the list to your bad manners.  And stupid tag lines are not against the list rules.   Attachments are.  Grow up.  Dennis Myhand since my initial post to this thread, i have had a private exchange with list nanny Paul Stamsen. i have been accused, because of my

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-06 Thread Wallace Adrian D'Alessio
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:28 PM, ah...clem boneheads...@gmail.com wrote: +++ i find THESE to be the height of hubris, discourtesy, and rudeness. Help bunny take over the world!??? REALLY??? after being forced to scroll past that 100 times, no

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-06 Thread Paul Stamsen
Previously, at 12:28 PM -0800 12/6/10, as ah...clem so eloquently wrote: But don't subject the rest of the list to your bad manners. And stupid tag lines are not against the list rules. Attachments are. Grow up. Dennis Myhand since my initial post to this thread, i have had a private

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-06 Thread Wallace Adrian D'Alessio
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Paul Stamsen paterfami...@gmail.comwrote: Previously, at 12:28 PM -0800 12/6/10, as ah...clem so eloquently wrote: But don't subject the rest of the list to your bad manners. And stupid tag lines are not against the list rules. Attachments are. Grow up.

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-05 Thread Dennis Myhand
ah...clem wrote: On Dec 4, 7:34 pm, Len Gerstel lgers...@gmail.com wrote: John, I know it is very small, and probably part of your sig, but please do not send any attachments to the list. Thanks, Len Gerstel List Nanny exsqueeze me, mr. list nanny sir, but why are you picking on

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-05 Thread Len Gerstel
OK folks a few things. My apologies to John. That was supposed to have gone to him off list. Sorry. Attachments are not allowed on any Low End Mac mailing list. No exceptions for sigs, screen shots of a problem, cute kitty cats, viruses from a windows pc or any thing else. NO attachments. As

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-05 Thread Al Poulin
On Dec 5, 2:12 am, ah...clem boneheads...@gmail.com wrote: ya know, rules are made by people, so that the rules can serve us. not so we can serve them.  and when they are broken, then they need to be fixed.  not saluted.  clearly the spirit of the rule is not only to save bandwidth (which is

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-05 Thread John Carmonne
On Dec 5, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Len Gerstel wrote: OK folks a few things. My apologies to John. That was supposed to have gone to him off list. Sorry. Attachments are not allowed on any Low End Mac mailing list. No exceptions for sigs, screen shots of a problem, cute kitty cats, viruses

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-05 Thread John Callahan
On Dec 5, 2010, at 7:17 AM, Dennis Myhand wrote: ah...clem wrote: On Dec 4, 7:34 pm, Len Gerstel lgers...@gmail.com wrote: John, I know it is very small, and probably part of your sig, but please do not send any attachments to the list. Thanks, Len Gerstel List Nanny exsqueeze me,

Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread Len Gerstel
John, I know it is very small, and probably part of your sig, but please do not send any attachments to the list. Thanks, Len Gerstel List Nanny On Dec 4, 2010, at 6:52 PM, John Carmonne wrote: On Dec 4, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Stephen Conrad wrote: One, what do you think of these? Just saw

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread John Carmonne
sorry bout this it's a mistake, Too quick on the fat finger. On Dec 4, 2010, at 4:34 PM, Len Gerstel wrote: John, I know it is very small, and probably part of your sig, but please do not send any attachments to the list. Thanks, Len Gerstel List Nanny On Dec 4, 2010, at 6:52 PM,

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread John Carmonne
On Dec 4, 2010, at 7:01 PM, ah...clem wrote: On Dec 4, 7:34 pm, Len Gerstel lgers...@gmail.com wrote: John, I know it is very small, and probably part of your sig, but please do not send any attachments to the list. Thanks, Len Gerstel List Nanny exsqueeze me, mr. list nanny sir,

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread Tim Gochnour
On Dec 4, 2010, at 11:37 PM, Isaac Smith wrote: On Dec 4, 2010, at 10:01 PM, ah...clem wrote: On Dec 4, 7:34 pm, Len Gerstel lgers...@gmail.com wrote: John, I know it is very small, and probably part of your sig, but please do not send any attachments to the list. Thanks, Len Gerstel

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread Tim Gochnour
On Dec 4, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Tim Gochnour wrote: I think the Nanny was referring not to the existence of the signature but to the small image that was attached at the end of it. Isaac Thank you Isaac. They say ig-nence is bliss. Clem seemed pretty happy talking about something

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread John Carmonne
On Dec 4, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Tim Gochnour wrote: On Dec 4, 2010, at 11:58 PM, Tim Gochnour wrote: I think the Nanny was referring not to the existence of the signature but to the small image that was attached at the end of it. Isaac Thank you Isaac. They say ig-nence is bliss.

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread Dan
At 7:01 PM -0800 12/4/2010, ah...clem wrote: On Dec 4, 7:34 pm, Len Gerstel lgers...@gmail.com wrote: I know it is very small, and probably part of your sig, but please do not send any attachments to the list. exsqueeze me, mr. list nanny sir, but why are you picking on only one person

Re: Nanny note Re: 2 Questions

2010-12-04 Thread ah...clem
Dija read the rules     ah...clem? No attachments.  Simple as that. -- 
Tim 
list moderator wow. what a surprise. calling all nannies. let's circle the wagons and fend off some valid criticism by deftly ignoring it while mindlessly quoting from the rule book. ya know, rules are made by