[Gaim-features] [ gaim-Feature Requests-1669311 ] Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms
Feature Requests item #1669311, was opened at 2007-02-26 12:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lschiere You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gtk-ui Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: rsk254 (rsk254) Assigned to: Richard Laager (rlaager) Summary: Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms Initial Comment: 1. A toggle switch. When set to "off", ignored and unignored users both appear on the room's roster (with the former noted with an X), just as they are today. When set to "on", ignored users are not shown at all. Reason: in many Yahoo chat rooms, bots outnumber real users 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1. There seems little need to display them as present if they're being ignored. 2. On the same pulldown menu which now includes "info" and "ignore" -- among other options -- include "block". Reason: having identified a user as a bot, I'd like to be able to remove it from my sight permanently. Reason for keeping "ignore" around as well: "ignore" is temporary, "block" is forever. 3. Add the ability to apply pulldown menu actions to users by clicking on their handle in the chat itself. (My guess is that this may not be as good an idea as I thought it was at first, but I'm throwing it in for consideration anyway.) Reason: avoids the need to scroll the room roster to locate the user. -- Comment By: Luke Schierer (lschiere) Date: 2007-04-12 12:16 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=28833 Originator: NO As we are closing this tracker, please submit any feature request that is still valid to http://developer.pidgin.im. Thanks. -- Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-03-02 22:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO I just did some research on this... This wouldn't be hard to implement, but it would be amazingly inefficient given the current architecture. We're storing the list of ignored users as a list, separate from the list store that tracks the users in the conversation. The only benefit I can see to that approach is that we can re-ignore a user if the leave and rejoin. I think that we should keep a separate ignore list just for that case, and use a bit in the list store for the main case. We'd only ever have to look at the list on user joins. Of course, on second thought, that's not necessarily going to be efficient either. I'll look at this some more... -- Comment By: rsk254 (rsk254) Date: 2007-02-26 13:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1260743 Originator: YES That (sorting ignored users to the bottom) is a really good idea. And it would mesh well with the sorting of buddies to the top. So let me modify my request to suggest that perhaps -- if it's a relatively lightweight change -- that we try it and see how it works in practice. -- Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-02-26 12:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO What if we just sorted ignored users to the bottom of the list? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Gaim-features mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-features
[Gaim-features] [ gaim-Feature Requests-1669311 ] Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms
Feature Requests item #1669311, was opened at 2007-02-26 11:31 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rlaager You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gtk-ui Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: rsk254 (rsk254) >Assigned to: Richard Laager (rlaager) Summary: Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms Initial Comment: 1. A toggle switch. When set to "off", ignored and unignored users both appear on the room's roster (with the former noted with an X), just as they are today. When set to "on", ignored users are not shown at all. Reason: in many Yahoo chat rooms, bots outnumber real users 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1. There seems little need to display them as present if they're being ignored. 2. On the same pulldown menu which now includes "info" and "ignore" -- among other options -- include "block". Reason: having identified a user as a bot, I'd like to be able to remove it from my sight permanently. Reason for keeping "ignore" around as well: "ignore" is temporary, "block" is forever. 3. Add the ability to apply pulldown menu actions to users by clicking on their handle in the chat itself. (My guess is that this may not be as good an idea as I thought it was at first, but I'm throwing it in for consideration anyway.) Reason: avoids the need to scroll the room roster to locate the user. -- Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-03-02 21:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO I just did some research on this... This wouldn't be hard to implement, but it would be amazingly inefficient given the current architecture. We're storing the list of ignored users as a list, separate from the list store that tracks the users in the conversation. The only benefit I can see to that approach is that we can re-ignore a user if the leave and rejoin. I think that we should keep a separate ignore list just for that case, and use a bit in the list store for the main case. We'd only ever have to look at the list on user joins. Of course, on second thought, that's not necessarily going to be efficient either. I'll look at this some more... -- Comment By: rsk254 (rsk254) Date: 2007-02-26 12:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1260743 Originator: YES That (sorting ignored users to the bottom) is a really good idea. And it would mesh well with the sorting of buddies to the top. So let me modify my request to suggest that perhaps -- if it's a relatively lightweight change -- that we try it and see how it works in practice. -- Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-02-26 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO What if we just sorted ignored users to the bottom of the list? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Gaim-features mailing list Gaim-features@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-features
[Gaim-features] [ gaim-Feature Requests-1669311 ] Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms
Feature Requests item #1669311, was opened at 2007-02-26 11:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rlaager You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gtk-ui Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: rsk254 (rsk254) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms Initial Comment: 1. A toggle switch. When set to "off", ignored and unignored users both appear on the room's roster (with the former noted with an X), just as they are today. When set to "on", ignored users are not shown at all. Reason: in many Yahoo chat rooms, bots outnumber real users 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1. There seems little need to display them as present if they're being ignored. 2. On the same pulldown menu which now includes "info" and "ignore" -- among other options -- include "block". Reason: having identified a user as a bot, I'd like to be able to remove it from my sight permanently. Reason for keeping "ignore" around as well: "ignore" is temporary, "block" is forever. 3. Add the ability to apply pulldown menu actions to users by clicking on their handle in the chat itself. (My guess is that this may not be as good an idea as I thought it was at first, but I'm throwing it in for consideration anyway.) Reason: avoids the need to scroll the room roster to locate the user. -- >Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-03-02 21:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO I just did some research on this... This wouldn't be hard to implement, but it would be amazingly inefficient given the current architecture. We're storing the list of ignored users as a list, separate from the list store that tracks the users in the conversation. The only benefit I can see to that approach is that we can re-ignore a user if the leave and rejoin. I think that we should keep a separate ignore list just for that case, and use a bit in the list store for the main case. We'd only ever have to look at the list on user joins. Of course, on second thought, that's not necessarily going to be efficient either. I'll look at this some more... -- Comment By: rsk254 (rsk254) Date: 2007-02-26 12:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1260743 Originator: YES That (sorting ignored users to the bottom) is a really good idea. And it would mesh well with the sorting of buddies to the top. So let me modify my request to suggest that perhaps -- if it's a relatively lightweight change -- that we try it and see how it works in practice. -- Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-02-26 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO What if we just sorted ignored users to the bottom of the list? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Gaim-features mailing list Gaim-features@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-features
[Gaim-features] [ gaim-Feature Requests-1669311 ] Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms
Feature Requests item #1669311, was opened at 2007-02-26 17:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rsk254 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gtk-ui Group: None >Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: rsk254 (rsk254) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms Initial Comment: 1. A toggle switch. When set to "off", ignored and unignored users both appear on the room's roster (with the former noted with an X), just as they are today. When set to "on", ignored users are not shown at all. Reason: in many Yahoo chat rooms, bots outnumber real users 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1. There seems little need to display them as present if they're being ignored. 2. On the same pulldown menu which now includes "info" and "ignore" -- among other options -- include "block". Reason: having identified a user as a bot, I'd like to be able to remove it from my sight permanently. Reason for keeping "ignore" around as well: "ignore" is temporary, "block" is forever. 3. Add the ability to apply pulldown menu actions to users by clicking on their handle in the chat itself. (My guess is that this may not be as good an idea as I thought it was at first, but I'm throwing it in for consideration anyway.) Reason: avoids the need to scroll the room roster to locate the user. -- >Comment By: rsk254 (rsk254) Date: 2007-02-26 18:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1260743 Originator: YES That (sorting ignored users to the bottom) is a really good idea. And it would mesh well with the sorting of buddies to the top. So let me modify my request to suggest that perhaps -- if it's a relatively lightweight change -- that we try it and see how it works in practice. -- Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-02-26 17:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO What if we just sorted ignored users to the bottom of the list? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Gaim-features mailing list Gaim-features@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-features
[Gaim-features] [ gaim-Feature Requests-1669311 ] Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms
Feature Requests item #1669311, was opened at 2007-02-26 11:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rlaager You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gtk-ui Group: None >Status: Pending Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: rsk254 (rsk254) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms Initial Comment: 1. A toggle switch. When set to "off", ignored and unignored users both appear on the room's roster (with the former noted with an X), just as they are today. When set to "on", ignored users are not shown at all. Reason: in many Yahoo chat rooms, bots outnumber real users 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1. There seems little need to display them as present if they're being ignored. 2. On the same pulldown menu which now includes "info" and "ignore" -- among other options -- include "block". Reason: having identified a user as a bot, I'd like to be able to remove it from my sight permanently. Reason for keeping "ignore" around as well: "ignore" is temporary, "block" is forever. 3. Add the ability to apply pulldown menu actions to users by clicking on their handle in the chat itself. (My guess is that this may not be as good an idea as I thought it was at first, but I'm throwing it in for consideration anyway.) Reason: avoids the need to scroll the room roster to locate the user. -- >Comment By: Richard Laager (rlaager) Date: 2007-02-26 11:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=156487 Originator: NO What if we just sorted ignored users to the bottom of the list? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Gaim-features mailing list Gaim-features@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-features
[Gaim-features] [ gaim-Feature Requests-1669311 ] Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms
Feature Requests item #1669311, was opened at 2007-02-26 17:31 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: gtk-ui Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: rsk254 (rsk254) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Enhanced functionality of ignoriblocking while in chat rooms Initial Comment: 1. A toggle switch. When set to "off", ignored and unignored users both appear on the room's roster (with the former noted with an X), just as they are today. When set to "on", ignored users are not shown at all. Reason: in many Yahoo chat rooms, bots outnumber real users 2:1, 3:1, or 4:1. There seems little need to display them as present if they're being ignored. 2. On the same pulldown menu which now includes "info" and "ignore" -- among other options -- include "block". Reason: having identified a user as a bot, I'd like to be able to remove it from my sight permanently. Reason for keeping "ignore" around as well: "ignore" is temporary, "block" is forever. 3. Add the ability to apply pulldown menu actions to users by clicking on their handle in the chat itself. (My guess is that this may not be as good an idea as I thought it was at first, but I'm throwing it in for consideration anyway.) Reason: avoids the need to scroll the room roster to locate the user. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=350235&aid=1669311&group_id=235 - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV ___ Gaim-features mailing list Gaim-features@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-features
