Patches item #1445599, was opened at 2006-03-08 03:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sf-robot You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1445599&group_id=235
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None >Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 4 Private: No Submitted By: jbossart (jbossart) Assigned to: Etan Reisner (deryni9) Summary: Buddy's authorization request Initial Comment: Instead of using gaim_resquest_input() or gaim_request_action(), each plugin could use a single function to indicate to Gaim Core that a buddy wants to add an account to his buddylist. Thanks to this, the core can identify this specific request and so, there will be an only point where this kind of request can pass through. After having the user's response, the core has to call callbacks included in prpl structure : accept or deny authorization request. It can be very useful for a libgaim use, because each plugin won't have to communicate directly with the GUI, the core gets this event and answer by calling common callbacks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: SourceForge Robot (sf-robot) Date: 2007-02-10 19:20 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1312539 Originator: NO This Tracker item was closed automatically by the system. It was previously set to a Pending status, and the original submitter did not respond within 14 days (the time period specified by the administrator of this Tracker). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Sadrul Habib Chowdhury (sadrul) Date: 2007-01-27 09:58 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1132702 Originator: NO This isn't valid anymore, is it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Etan Reisner (deryni9) Date: 2006-03-09 05:08 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=516184 I've only glanced at your patch a little but it seems unnecessarily complex to me. Do we really think that adding two prpl_info callbacks is the right way to do this? As opposed to just allowing the prpl to pass callback functions into the request function? I'm attaching my old version of the patch as an example. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Evan Schoenberg (evands) Date: 2006-03-08 21:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=669684 Hot. :) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=300235&aid=1445599&group_id=235 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Gaim-patches mailing list Gaim-patches@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gaim-patches
