Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-02 Thread Genghis Khan
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 14:20:57 +0100 Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote: Le 01/11/2014 15:10, Josef Kufner a écrit : Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes in GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-02 Thread Yann Leboulanger
On 11/02/2014 07:06 AM, Genghis Khan wrote: Perhaps realising built-in features into plugins like Liferea 1.11.x and MOC 2.7 http://moc.daper.net/node/1217 or overhaul code cleaning, polishing, tightening and upgrading like MOC 2.6. For example, since systray is considered as legacy, it

[Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Josef Kufner
Good morning everyone, Gajim is very old and still has version zero.something, which means Gajim is unstable and incomplete. The first part is not true for very long time, and the second... what is missing to version 1.0 ? If there is something missing, what about making Version 1.0 milestone

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Le 01/11/2014 14:04, Josef Kufner a écrit : Good morning everyone, Gajim is very old and still has version zero.something, which means Gajim is unstable and incomplete. The first part is not true for very long time, and the second... what is missing to version 1.0 ? If there is something

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Josef Kufner
Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes in GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who knows ... Well, that should be 2.0. The 1.0 should be before such big change. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Le 01/11/2014 15:10, Josef Kufner a écrit : Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes in GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who knows ... Well, that should be 2.0. The 1.0 should be before such big change. I

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Josef Kufner
Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:20: Le 01/11/2014 15:10, Josef Kufner a écrit : Yann Leboulanger wrote, on 1.11.2014 14:07: Next major version will be with GTK3, which mean a lot of changes in GUI. That could be a reason to name it 1.0 ... Who knows ... Well, that should be 2.0. The

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Rafał Miłecki
On 1 November 2014 14:07, Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote: Le 01/11/2014 14:04, Josef Kufner a écrit : Good morning everyone, Gajim is very old and still has version zero.something, which means Gajim is unstable and incomplete. Thanks for your comment about the stability of Gajim.

Re: [Gajim-devel] Version 1.0

2014-11-01 Thread Andrew Diederich
On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Yann Leboulanger aste...@lagaule.org wrote: That's already a big big work. It has been started and Gajim is usable with GTK3. But it needs a lot of love before it's releasable. We'll probably do a release once it's done. So that's the main thing on the