Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Yann Leboulanger
Damien Thébault a écrit : Le vendredi 27 juin 2008 à 11:45 +0200, Yann Leboulanger a écrit : Tomas Karasek wrote: What I'm looking for is either - some elegant way how to do both A and requests asynchronously (like nonblocking getaddrinfo) which would be a nice solution or - nonblocki

Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Damien Thébault
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 15:39, Yann Leboulanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wow cool ! We unfortunatly don't have much time now because we'd like to > release very very soon, but that would be very cool to finalize that. What > are you plans about those bindings? Do you think to send them to author

Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
"Damien Thébault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I even replaced the resolver in the gajim code by a small wrapper and > it's working well. > I'd like to test the case here, the only case where there is a problem > for me is with a google talk account (doesn't seems to use the > resolver, is this th

Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Damien Thébault
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 16:40, Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Damien Thébault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > GTalk uses SRV records. Maybe you don't check them yet? > For records, my server (webkeks.org) provides them - so if you > need a server to test. > It was the other w

Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Jonathan Schleifer
"Damien Thébault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, let's put this code somewhere now :) > I'll maybe post the patch for gajim if someone is interested. Feel free to post it here so it can be applied post-0.12. -- Jonathan signature.asc Description: PGP signature __

Re: [Gajim-devel] blocking getaddrinfo

2008-07-01 Thread Damien Thébault
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 20:03, Jonathan Schleifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Damien Thébault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ok, let's put this code somewhere now :) >> I'll maybe post the patch for gajim if someone is interested. > > Feel free to post it here so it can be applied post-0.12. The