wow. I guess http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74620 makes it
clear it is not us.
Thanks for finding out. Well GTK+ was always like that, and especially
in Windows it is more untested. The problem is not if GTK was better
when Gajim started, but if there is a real alternative open source
solution for a stable and extensively tested GUI. And there isn't,
because open source does not give enough money back for such a
mechanism to exist.
GTK in Linux "just works" so it's acceptable allover as such.
if you are a python fan, then the best GUI for Windows is wxPython and
you can have a look at IronPython speaking to MS SWF (.NET).
On 1/6/07, Andrew Diederich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Nikos,
>
> Friday, January 5, 2007, 11:44:59 AM, you wrote:
>
> > yes and unfortunately if you have this everytime, I advise you to look
> > for this problem in GOOGLE or in bugs.gnome.org under GTK+ in case
> > it's been reported. [which I bet it has]
>
> Looks like it's been reported 6 times since 2002 (bugs 371288, 376779,
> 351617, 344826, 329356, and one fix attempt in 74620.
>
> > in any case, this doesn't seem to be a bug from our side (at least as
> > far as I can say)
>
> Yeah, that looks true.
>
> > GTK (and especially on Windows) sucks. More on why
> > http://blogs.gnome.org/view/timj/2006/12/20/0 [and this talks about
> > Linux too! imagine Windows.. :/ {AFAICT, only one guy hacks on
> > Windows}]
>
> Was gtk+ better when gajim was started, then? I do really like gajim
> (partially because I'm a python fan), but the gtk+ is getting on my
> nerves.
>
> > if u have evidence it is us, inform us though.
>
> Will do.
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> ___
> Gajim-devel mailing list
> Gajim-devel@gajim.org
> https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
>
___
Gajim-devel mailing list
Gajim-devel@gajim.org
https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel
