Great, I am glad it was useful.
Renaming the repository isn't needed, especially if you just have one
pull request open at a time. But there have been times I have had
maybe 4 or 5 open pull requests at once, so then it helps to keep
track of which repository maps to which feature or bug fix. If
Hi John,
Thank you, this is really useful!
I don't understand the purpose of renaming the repository to
galaxy-central-new-feature - what does this achieve?
I'm pretty new to mercurial and more familiar with git, so that could
be why I'm confused.
Thanks,
Clare
On 24 August 2012 00:07, John
Maybe I'm just doing it wrong… but I find it unusually difficult to put
together a coherent pull request without doing a dedicated repo clone.
maybe somebody who knows a good way to submit pull requests could populate this
wiki page?
http://wiki.g2.bx.psu.edu/Develop/Mercurial
brad
On Aug 23,
I don't know that difficult is the right word, I would call the
process heavy handed and time consuming, especially relative to
similar git workflows. I have heard the Galaxy developers say on
multiple occasions the prefer pull requests coming using a dedicated
clone though and this makes a lot of
