Hi all,
To make someone an administrator on a local Galaxy install, do I just
need to add their email (login) to the comma separated setting
admin_users in universe_wsgi.ini?
https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/wiki/Admin/AdminInterface
I have this working on one server, but it doesn't
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Hans-Rudolf Hotz h...@fmi.ch wrote:
Hi Peter
First,the obvious question: Have you restarted galaxy?
Yes, and I tried hard reloads in two different browsers (both of which
are working on the primary server).
Second: I vaguely remember a similar problem, and if
Hello everyone,
I need some advice on how to represent the output of all the different tools
inside a workflow in an external application.
I am looking into using galaxy as a digital evidence processing tool. It is
very important that i can access the intermediate sets of data created by
every
Peter Cock wrote:
Which version of BLAST do you have?
If you're using the megablast tool in Galaxy, then it will be NCBI
legacy BLAST using the blastall binary.
If you're using the (commented out by default) BLAST+ wrappers, then
it will be using the blastn binary. There were changes to
Duddy, John wrote:
I need to be able to set some metadata in some custom data types. For now,
I'm just trying to set the value of the 'misc_info' field. The client script
is this:
put( sys.argv[1], sys.argv[2], { 'update_type' : 'metadata', 'misc_info' :
'meta data msg' } )
and my API
I am configuring galaxy to use a shared filesystem location as it's TEMP
directory. I have modified $TEMP variable with the necessary path. Are there
any other changes that I need to make? The cluster config page
https://bitbucket.org/galaxy/galaxy-central/wiki/Config/Cluster mentions about
Silly me - 'misc_info' shows up in the show() output, but I didn't bother to
verify that it was metadata and not some other member.
Thanks!
John Duddy
Sr. Staff Software Engineer
Illumina, Inc.
9885 Towne Centre Drive
San Diego, CA 92121
Tel: 858-736-3584
E-mail: jdu...@illumina.com
Is it possible to run a specific workflow only on certain nodes of the
cluster? Either using the API or by setting something in the config files?
Thanks,
Liisa
___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.
Allen, Benjamin S wrote:
I'm wondering if its possible to somehow present the user with a param that
lets him or her specify number of cores, nodes, memory, and wall time from
within the workflow for a specific tool.
Other than coming up with a predictive algorithm for each tool's resource
Dave Walton wrote:
Could someone who has successfully gotten the IGV tool to work using NGINX as
your proxy, tell me if there was anything specific they needed to do with
their NGINX or galaxy config to get it working?
Hi Dave,
It's necessary to set up the more advanced configuration under
Liisa Koski wrote:
Is it possible to run a specific workflow only on certain nodes of the
cluster? Either using the API or by setting something in the config files?
Hi Liisa,
Galaxy currently only allows specification of these sorts of parameters
on a per-tool basis, so it's not possible to
Matthew Conte wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'm having several problems with my local galaxy install which may or may
not be related to one another.
The first problem I'm having is with the Display data in browser feature.
Some files type formats (fastqsanger, fasta) display fine. However,
Hi Nate,
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Nate Coraor n...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
Matthew Conte wrote:
Good afternoon,
I'm having several problems with my local galaxy install which may or may
not be related to one another.
The first problem I'm having is with the Display data in browser
Matthew Conte wrote:
Hi Nate,
Yep, I'm using mod_xsendfile-0.12 for apache and x-accel-redirect for nginx,
but both webservers are showing the same problems. If I use Galaxy's
built-in webserver, I don't have the above problems, so the problem is
probably related to the proxy server. I
Hi Nate,
I've turned both apache and nginx logging up to debug and still don't see
anything of relevance in the error logs for each of the problems I listed.
Should I send you my universe_wsgi.ini?
Thanks,
Matt
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Nate Coraor n...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
Matthew Conte
Matthew Conte wrote:
Hi Nate,
I've turned both apache and nginx logging up to debug and still don't see
anything of relevance in the error logs for each of the problems I listed.
Should I send you my universe_wsgi.ini?
That'd help, and the relevant sections of your Apache and/or nginx
16 matches
Mail list logo
