Re: [galaxy-dev] Bismark issue

2013-08-21 Thread Bjoern Gruening

Hi Shane,

please find a new bismark version with an updated dependency on samtools
0.1.19 here:

 http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/bgruening/bismark 

Thanks for reporting that issue,
Bjoern


 I've had a bit of a time trying to get Bismark working on our Galaxy
 instance.  The install doesn't work because of the dependency on
 samtools 0.1.18 but in fact it requires samtools 0.1.19.  I have a
 build of that installed as standard on our system so putting a symlink
 to that in the place of the samtools built for the bismark wrapper
 makes it work - I was seeing issues where the BAM file wasn't created
 and noticed in Bjoern's readme.rst that said it required samtools
 0.1.19 or later.
 
 
 Shane
 
 --
 For urgent cases, contact supp...@biomatters.com
 
 
 Dr Shane Sturrock
 shane.sturr...@biomatters.com
 Senior Scientist
 Tel: +64 (0) 9 379 5064
 76 Anzac Ave
 Auckland
 New Zealand
 
 
 ___
 Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
 in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
 and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
   http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
 
 To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
   http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/




___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/


Re: [galaxy-dev] Bismark issue

2013-08-21 Thread Shane Sturrock
Hi Bjoern,

I've upgraded our machine and confirmed it now works fine.  Thanks for that!

Shane

On 22/08/2013, at 5:17 AM, Bjoern Gruening bjoern.gruen...@gmail.com wrote:

 
 Hi Shane,
 
 please find a new bismark version with an updated dependency on samtools
 0.1.19 here:
 
 http://toolshed.g2.bx.psu.edu/view/bgruening/bismark 
 
 Thanks for reporting that issue,
 Bjoern
 
 
 I've had a bit of a time trying to get Bismark working on our Galaxy
 instance.  The install doesn't work because of the dependency on
 samtools 0.1.18 but in fact it requires samtools 0.1.19.  I have a
 build of that installed as standard on our system so putting a symlink
 to that in the place of the samtools built for the bismark wrapper
 makes it work - I was seeing issues where the BAM file wasn't created
 and noticed in Bjoern's readme.rst that said it required samtools
 0.1.19 or later.
 
 
 Shane
 
 --
 For urgent cases, contact supp...@biomatters.com
 
 
 Dr Shane Sturrock
 shane.sturr...@biomatters.com
 Senior Scientist
 Tel: +64 (0) 9 379 5064
 76 Anzac Ave
 Auckland
 New Zealand
 
 
 ___
 Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
 in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
 and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/
 
 To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/
 
 
 
 

--
For urgent cases, contact supp...@biomatters.com

Dr Shane Sturrock
shane.sturr...@biomatters.com
Senior Scientist
Tel: +64 (0) 9 379 5064
76 Anzac Ave
Auckland
New Zealand



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Please keep all replies on the list by using reply all
in your mail client.  To manage your subscriptions to this
and other Galaxy lists, please use the interface at:
  http://lists.bx.psu.edu/

To search Galaxy mailing lists use the unified search at:
  http://galaxyproject.org/search/mailinglists/