Re: [galaxy-dev] Loss of sub-task order with parallelism

2012-06-14 Thread Dannon Baker
On Jun 14, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Peter Cock wrote: In a separate example with 33 sub-tasks, there were two of these inversions, while in yet another example with 33 sub-tasks there was a trio submitted out of order. This non-deterministic behavior is a little surprising, but in itself not an

Re: [galaxy-dev] Loss of sub-task order with parallelism

2012-06-14 Thread Peter Cock
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Dannon Baker dannonba...@me.com wrote: On Jun 14, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Peter Cock wrote: In a separate example with 33 sub-tasks, there were two of these inversions, while in yet another example with 33 sub-tasks there was a trio submitted out of order. This