On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Björn Grüning
bjoern.gruen...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2014, 10:46 + schrieb Peter Cock:
...
However, at only 5kb the FASTA file is small and fine to bundle -
but the BAM (49kb), log (123kb) and MAF (764kb) quickly add
up so I would prefer
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out that there are several different ways to compare the
history output item to a test file beyond the default “diff”, including
contains, re_match, sim_size, etc, this is set by the “compare” attribute in
the xml tag for the test output. If you really don’t
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Daniel Blankenberg d...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out that there are several different ways to
compare the history output item to a test file beyond the default
diff, including contains, re_match, sim_size, etc, this is set by
the
Hello Peter,
I'm also sure we could enhance hte twill code to use the dictionary approach
used in the API based testing. However, pervasive use of Javascript is being
introduced into the Galaxy code base at a fast pace and twill does not work
with Javascript. So clearly the use of twill for
Hi Dan,
Hi all,
I just wanted to point out that there are several different ways to compare
the history output item to a test file beyond the default “diff”, including
contains, re_match, sim_size, etc, this is set by the “compare” attribute in
the xml tag for the test output. If you
Hi Björn,
I think twill is going to be around for a while yet, but it is quickly becoming
more critical to eliminate it. I haven't yet looked at Johns tests using the
API, but my understanding is that they are focused on tools. We're using twill
a lot in other areas besides tools, so it will
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Bouvier d...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for pointing this out, I've applied your changes in
Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2014, 10:46 + schrieb Peter Cock:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Bouvier d...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Bouvier d...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for pointing this out, I've applied your changes in
12478:15fc8675064e on the default branch.
--Dave B.
Thanks Dave,
RE: http://lists.bx.psu.edu/pipermail/galaxy-dev/2014-February/018154.html
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Peter Cock p.j.a.c...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Dave Bouvier d...@bx.psu.edu wrote:
Peter,
Thanks for pointing this out, I've applied your changes in
12478:15fc8675064e on the default branch.
--Dave B.
Thanks Dave,
RE:
10 matches
Mail list logo
